PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16493559

[Evaluation of CVC-set].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Frequently central venous catheter sets do not contain all necessary materials. To evaluate, if combined measures using a specially arranged central venous catheter (CVC) set result in economical and clinical advantages, we compared both cost and time differences of a CVC complete set with ECG guide wire lead and an adhesive fixation with a standard set requiring additional materials, ECG fluid column lead and surgical suture. Furthermore, quality of different ECG leads, the reliability and tolerability of the adhesive fixation was compared. METHODS: 76 elective adult surgical patients were randomly assigned to receive either a control CVC set or a test CVC complete set, which was featured by preconnected stopcocks, included sterile drapes, guide wire ECG position control, and an adhesive fixation. We performed ECG-guided placement of the central venous catheter using a guide wire lead in the test CVC set vs. fluid column lead in the control CVC set. Time was recorded for preparation phase of the nurse and the anesthetist, for the puncture phase, for the ECG position control and time for CVC fixation. Quality of ECG position control using guide wire or fluid column was determined by forming Pmax/R ratio. Costs of the complete set and the standard set with additional material were compared. RESULTS: Times for preparation of nurse and anesthetists, for ECG position control and catheter fixation were significantly shorter using the test catheter set and resulted in a total time saving of 6 min (P < 0.01). Times for sterile preparation and central venous puncture were not significantly different between the groups. ECG position control using the guide wire was successful in 37 out of 38 patients (97%) and in 34 of 38 patients (89%), respectively. Pmax/R ratio was 0.8 +/- 0.2 using the guide wire versus 0.5 +/- 0.2, respectively. There were only 2 out of 38 adhesive fixations, that had to be replaced, while the mean duration of adhesive fixation was 6.2 days (3-15 days). Avoidance of disposable materials in the test CVC set led to a significant reduction of costs compared to the control CVC set. CONCLUSION: The test CVC complete set allows a significant time saving and cost reduction in performing a central venous catheter line because of completely included disposable materials. CVC position control via guide wire needs less time and shows significantly better quality of ECG compared to fluid column ECG lead. An adhesive revealed to be a reliable CVC fixation comparable to a surgical suture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M T Pawlik, P Lemberger, E Hansen. 2006. [Evaluation of CVC-set].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-870451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Healing substrates with mobile, particle-filled microcapsules: designing a 'repair and go' system.

We model the rolling motion of a fluid-driven, particle-filled microcapsule along a heterogeneous, adhesive substrate to determine how the release of the encapsulated nanoparticles can be harnessed to repair damage on the underlying surface. We integrate the lattice Boltzmann model for hydrodynamics and the lattice spring model for the micromechanics of elastic solids to capture the interactions between the elastic shell of the microcapsule and the surrounding fluids. A Brownian dynamics model is used to simulate the release of nanoparticles from the capsule and their diffusion into the surrounding solution. We focus on a substrate that contains a damaged region (e.g. a crack or eroded surface coating), which prevents the otherwise mobile capsule from rolling along the surface. We isolate conditions where nanoparticles released from the arrested capsule can repair the damage and thereby enable the capsules to again move along the substrate. Through these studies, we establish guidelines for designing particle-filled microcapsules that perform a 'repair and go' function and thus, can be utilized to repair damage in microchannels and microfluidic devices.

Adhesives↗

Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of grinding on the bonding effectiveness of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive to fluorosed enamel. METHODS: The teeth were classified using the Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI). Fluorosed teeth (TFI=5) obtained from Isparta (Turkey) and control teeth (TFI=0) obtained from Leuven (Belgium) were used. Using a depth-marking diamond bur, 0.3mm of enamel was removed from mid-buccal and mid-palatal/lingual surfaces of the teeth, whereas the area adjacent to the ground area was left unprepared. A two-step self-etch (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray) and a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Optibond FL, Kerr) were used to bond the resin composite to the ground and unground enamel. Rectangular micro-specimens were prepared using the slow-speed diamond saw and tested in tensile to determine the micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS). RESULTS: The microTBS to unground fluorosed enamel was significantly lower than to ground fluorosed enamel for Clearfil Protect Bond (15.8+/-15.2 and 45.0+/-12.4MPa, p<0.0001) and for Optibond FL (35.5+/-21.4 and 50.5+/-12.3MPa, p<0.05), respectively. In control teeth, Clearfil Protect Bond bonded better to ground enamel (p<0.01), whereas OptiBond FL exhibited a similar bonding effectiveness to ground and unground enamel (p=0.0634). SIGNIFICANCE: Preparation of enamel improved the resin-enamel bond strength in fluorosed teeth. The bonding effectiveness to unground enamel was lower in fluorosed teeth than in control teeth for the self-etch adhesive tested.

Adhesives↗