PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16501316

Implants for orthodontic anchorage. Meta-analysis.

Birute Labanauskaite·Gvidas Jankauskas·Arunas Vasiliauskas·Nazem Haffar
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to review and update current data of the use of implants for orthodontic anchorage. A meta-analysis of selected literature was carried out and a total of 415 articles were identified in this process. Having reviewed the articles or their abstracts/summaries the data were evaluated and the articles were categorized according to the journal and the year of publication, the type of the article and the type of the implant. The interest in the possibilities of the implant usage for orthodontic anchorage is noticeably increasing and today it has reached the peak. In order to facilitate the understanding of the wide range of implants, we suggested the classification of the implants for orthodontic anchorage according to the shape and size, the implant bone contact and the application of the implant. We systemized the information about types of implants and their advantages in respect of traditional orthodontic treatment.

Explore related subjects

Bone PlatesBone ScrewsDental ImplantsDental Prosthesis DesignHumansOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresOrthodontic Appliance DesignOsseointegrationPalatePatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeJournal ArticleMeta-Analysis

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Birute Labanauskaite, Gvidas Jankauskas, Arunas Vasiliauskas, Nazem Haffar. 2005. Implants for orthodontic anchorage. Meta-analysis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16501316/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Stacked plating for metadiaphyseal fractures of the distal radius: a technique report.

Combined injuries of the distal radius and shaft are rare, are usually caused by high energy, and pose a surgical dilemma. Surgical tactics and implants that are routinely used either for isolated fractures of the distal radius or for fractures of the radial shaft are often not applicable for this combined injury. We describe a technique of dual-stacked plating for these metadiaphyseal fractures and its use in two patients.

Bone Plates↗
PubMed2007

Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies.

The management of intra-articular distal humeral fractures remains a difficult surgical problem. Although an olecranon osteotomy provides excellent exposure for management of these fractures, a number of complications can occur after the creation and repair of the osteotomy including nonunion, malunion, hardware failure, and pain secondary to prominent hardware. In an effort to reduce the incidence of these complications, the senior authors now use contoured 3.5 mm reconstruction plates for the fixation of their apex-distal chevron olecranon osteotomies. Two surgeons at a single institution used this technique of exposure on a series of 17 consecutive patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures between 1996 and 1999. In this series, all osteotomies united. There was one complication related specifically to the osteotomy: one of the screws in the plate penetrated the proximal radioulnar joint, interfering with forearm rotation; a second procedure was required to shorten the screw. Only one of the 17 patients requested plate removal during the 32 month (average) follow-up period. Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies using a 3.5 mm reconstruction plate provides a construct with predictable healing and few complications. The overall results using this technique are comparable with other reported methods in the literature.

Bone Plates↗