PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16528138

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, flexible-dose study to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and effects of treatment discontinuation with escitalopram and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.

Abstract

This multinational, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study evaluated the short- and long-term antidepressant tolerability and efficacy of escitalopram and paroxetine. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring adverse events throughout the study, and discontinuation events during brief treatment interruption and tapered withdrawal. Discontinuation-emergent effects were evaluated in two separate double-blind periods. First, to mimic the consequences of non-compliance, patients were randomized to one of two treatment interruption periods (placebo-substitution for 3-5 days). Second, patients were randomized to a 1-2-week tapered withdrawal period randomly scheduled between weeks 28 and 31. The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in total Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at week 8, using the principle of last observation carried forward. A total of 323 patients entered 8 weeks of double-blind treatment and received at least one flexible dose of escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) or paroxetine (20-40 mg/day). Patients who demonstrated evidence of a significant clinical improvement (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement of 1 or 2) at week 8 entered a 19-week, double-blind maintenance period during which they were treated with the same dose they received at week 8, followed by a 1-2-week tapered withdrawal period. A total of 89 patients (28%) withdrew during the study; significantly (P<0.01) more patients withdrew from the paroxetine group (34%) than from the escitalopram group (21%), and significantly (P<0.05) more paroxetine patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. The mean MADRS total score improved for both treatment groups from baseline to week 8, with no statistical difference between groups. In severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS total score >or=30), escitalopram was superior (P<0.05) to paroxetine at week 27 (end of maintenance treatment). There was a high prevalence of sexual dysfunction at baseline: the mean Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) score was approximately 20 points in both treatment groups. Mean total ASEX scores increased slightly above baseline values during the acute period and declined slightly below baseline values towards the end of the maintenance period. During taper and cessation of treatment, patients in the paroxetine group demonstrated significantly more discontinuation symptoms relative to escitalopram based on the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms scores.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David S Baldwin, James A Cooper, Anna K T Huusom, Ian Hindmarch. 2006. A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, flexible-dose study to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and effects of treatment discontinuation with escitalopram and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yic.0000194377.88330.1d

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Screening of citalopram, fluoxetine and their metabolites in human urine samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A global robustness/ruggedness study.

Capillary gas chromatography with mass spectrometry detection in SIM mode (GC-MS-SIM) has been used for the analysis of citalopram (CIT), fluoxetine (FLX), and all of their metabolites in urine samples. The instrumental parameters affecting GC separation and MS-SIM detection were investigated. A validation procedure was performed on urine matrix and a simultaneous robustness/ruggedness evaluation is also presented in this paper. An optimized solid-phase extraction (SPE) has been applied, reaching in this way to limits of detection (LODs) between 0.7 ng L(-1) (CIT) and 33.6 microg L(-1) (CIT-PA). A pharmacokinetic screening in clinical urine samples has been also carried out.

Citalopram↗

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition screening: comparison of three tests.

There are several different experimental systems for screening of in vitro inhibitory potency of drugs under development. In this study we compared three different types of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition tests: the traditional single substrate assays, the fluorescent probe method with recombinant human CYPs, and a novel n-in-one technique. All major hepatic drug-metabolizing CYPs were included (1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, 3A4). Six compounds (sotalol, propranolol, citalopram, fluoxetine, oxazepam and diazepam) were selected for detailed comparisons. The IC50 values of each of these compounds were measured using the three assay types. The inhibitory potencies of these model drugs were generally within the same order of magnitude and followed similar inhibition profiles in all the assay types. Clinically observed inhibitory interactions, or lack thereof, were predictable with all three assays. Comparison of potencies of 'diagnostic' inhibitors revealed also some notable differences between the assays, especially regarding CYP2E1. The potency of inhibitors towards CYP3A4 was dependent on the substrate and reaction measured. Generally all three assays gave reasonably comparable results, although some unexplained differences were also noted.

Citalopram↗