PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16788795

[Success and failure in interdisciplinary studies].

R Schwarz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Association of Uro-genital Oncology (AUO) and the Association of Radiological Oncology (ARO) proceeded three studies on the indication of prostate cancer within the last 10 years. In this article, one of the leading study investigators is presenting determines on success or failure of this interdisciplinary studies.

Explore related subjects

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCooperative BehaviorGermanyHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient SelectionProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearchResearch Support as TopicRetreatmentComparative StudyEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Schwarz. 2006. [Success and failure in interdisciplinary studies].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-006-1087-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Safe fertility-preserving management in gynecological malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review in the available literature about the safe fertility-preserving management in gynecological malignancies, focusing on the selection criteria of the patients, treatment options and follow-up. DESIGN: Literature survey. RESULTS: The incidence of cancer in women who still want to get pregnant is increasing significantly. An early detection in gynecological malignancies allows less aggressive approaches to cure such disorders. A more conservative management, which preserves fertility, is considered safe and an option for those who have not completed their child-bearing. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer may be candidates to a safe fertility-preserving management. A careful stage and follow-up of the patients is essential to achieve success with this practice.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed2007

Defining optimal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: We defined an optimal curative strategy for muscle invasive bladder cancer and to determine how best to deliver curative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed published reports from 1985 to 2006 dealing with the treatment of muscle invasive (stage T2-T4a) bladder cancer. We analyzed all cohort, phase II and randomized phase III studies providing level 1 to 3 evidence impacting survival. RESULTS: Cisplatin based chemotherapy combined with high quality radical cystectomy and complete pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival over that of cystectomy alone. Surgery quality is an important predictor of survival even in patients receiving chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is favored over adjuvant chemotherapy because it is better tolerated and more patients are able to receive effective therapy before rather than after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and complete pelvic lymph node dissection is the optimal curative strategy in most patients presenting with muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗