PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16794671

[Prescription changes in pharmacies].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prescriptions must sometimes be changed or clarified before dispensing in order to provide a safe and professional service. The aims of this study were to gain insight into the types of prescription interventions performed by pharmacists, to explore the reason behind the interventions and to describe to which extent and how interventions are documented and communicated to the prescribers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prescription interventions (N = 1,084) performed at a community pharmacy in Norway from January 2002 to September 2004 were categorised. Two focus groups were used to validate the categories. The pharmacists in these groups were invited to discuss working procedures and professional judgements related to prescription interventions. RESULTS: The prescription interventions were grouped into seven categories. The two largest categories were "drugs not available" (37%) and "clarification of drug choice and dosage" (22%). Many interventions are not communicated to the prescribers. In principal, the pharmacists felt that interventions should be communicated to the prescriber even if this is often not the case. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists intervene on a range of prescription issues that are not communicated to the prescribers. Feedback requires time and resources for all involved. By ensuring that computer systems used by general practitioners comply with reimbursement legislation and technical requirements for prescriptions, the demand for many prescription interventions will be reduced. There is a need for a joint professional discussion on differentiation and standardisation of feedback on prescription interventions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ingunn Mandt, Anne Marie Horn, Anne Gerd Granås. 2006-06-22. [Prescription changes in pharmacies].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16794671/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗