PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16923388

Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification.

Adam J Engler·Shamik Sen·H Lee Sweeney·Dennis E Discher
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Microenvironments appear important in stem cell lineage specification but can be difficult to adequately characterize or control with soft tissues. Naive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are shown here to specify lineage and commit to phenotypes with extreme sensitivity to tissue-level elasticity. Soft matrices that mimic brain are neurogenic, stiffer matrices that mimic muscle are myogenic, and comparatively rigid matrices that mimic collagenous bone prove osteogenic. During the initial week in culture, reprogramming of these lineages is possible with addition of soluble induction factors, but after several weeks in culture, the cells commit to the lineage specified by matrix elasticity, consistent with the elasticity-insensitive commitment of differentiated cell types. Inhibition of nonmuscle myosin II blocks all elasticity-directed lineage specification-without strongly perturbing many other aspects of cell function and shape. The results have significant implications for understanding physical effects of the in vivo microenvironment and also for therapeutic uses of stem cells.

Explore related subjects

BiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ShapeCulture MediaCytoskeletonElasticityExtracellular MatrixFocal AdhesionsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMyosin Type IIOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeRNATranscription FactorsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adam J Engler, Shamik Sen, H Lee Sweeney, Dennis E Discher. 2006-08-25. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Genomic and Transcriptomic Correlates of Deep PSA Response in Patients with Metastatic Androgen Pathway Modulation-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in metastatic androgen pathway modulation-sensitive prostate cancer (mAPMS) treatment, outcomes remain heterogeneous. Achieving a post-treatment undetectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a strong prognostic marker. We aimed to identify genomic and transcriptomic determinants of PSA response in a real-world clinical-genomic cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mAPMS who underwent DNA (Tempus xT) and, in a subset, RNA (Tempus xR) sequencing were identified from the Tempus Lens database. Inclusion required stage IV disease within 90 days of sample collection and samples obtained within 12 months before or 3 months after treatment initiation. Patients with PSA at 6 months (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;525) were classified as PSA-low (<0.1&#x2009;ng/mL, n&#x2009;=&#x2009;240) or PSA-high (&#x2265;0.1&#x2009;ng/mL, n&#x2009;=&#x2009;285). Overall survival (OS) was assessed by 6-month landmark analysis with delayed-entry adjustment. Logistic and Cox models were adjusted for clinical variables. Sensitivity analyses used a relative definition of&#x2009;>&#x2009;95% PSA decline from baseline. RESULTS: Baseline PSA was lower in PSA-low versus PSA-high patients (24 vs 36&#x2009;ng/mL, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.01). SPOP (17% vs 11%) and ZFHX3 (2.5% vs 6%) alterations differed between groups, but neither persisted after adjustment. Using the relative definition, ZMYM3 and JAK1 alterations were independently associated with failure to achieve a deep PSA response. Expression of PSMA, TROP2, B7-H3, and STEAP1 did not differ between groups. PSA-low status was independently associated with improved OS, as was deep relative response. CONCLUSION: Deep PSA response at 6 months correlates with improved OS in mAPMS. Integrating molecular markers with PSA response may inform treatment intensification or de-escalation strategies.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2026

Systemic treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

IMPORTANCE: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic diagnosis with historically poor prognosis. It is the tenth most prevalent cancer in the US & UK. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Despite increasing understanding of its molecular biology, systemic treatment options for advanced disease remain limited, and survival outcomes have improved only modestly over the past decade. OBSERVATIONS: This narrative review traces the evolution of systemic therapy for advanced PDAC from gemcitabine monotherapy through the landmark FOLFIRINOX (PRODIGE trial) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (MPACT trial) combination regimens, which remain the standard of care. Second-line options including liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (NAPOLI-1) and maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA1/2-mutated disease (POLO) are also reviewed. Emerging data on sequential treatment strategies (SEQUENCE trial), biomarker-driven treatment selection (PRIMUS-001, PASS-01), and precision medicine approaches targeting actionable molecular subgroups, including dMMR/MSI-H, NTRK fusions, and homologous recombination deficiency are discussed. Real-world evidence comparing FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is critically appraised, including the challenges of patient selection, tolerance, and applicability outside clinical trial settings. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite incremental progress, the treatment landscape of advanced PDAC remains challenging. Molecular stratification and biomarker-driven precision oncology represent the most promising path forward. This review serves as a clinical reference for physicians managing advanced pancreatic cancer, highlighting current evidence, evidence limitations, and future research priorities including prospective biomarker-driven trials and improved access to genomic testing.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2026

Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration in an indigenous African cohort using both Simoa and NULISA platforms.

In low- and middle-income countries, Alzheimer's disease (AD) constitutes a growing public health burden. However, AD biomarkers research remains underrepresented in African populations. This study assesses core biomarkers of AD and their relevance in the African context as potential aid in clinical diagnosis. Nigerian older adults from VALIANT cohort (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;967) underwent biomarker quantification in plasma (p-tau217, GFAP, NfL, A&#x3b2;42 and A&#x3b2;40) employing both the Single Molecule Assay (Simoa, Quanterix) and Nucleic acid-Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA, Alamar). Biomarkers were associated with disease severity in clinical-diagnostic and clinical-biological groups, with stepwise increases of p-tau217, NfL and GFAP from cognitively unimpaired to dementia (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Results were consistent across platforms. Comparison between sexes showed higher biomarker levels in male participants across diagnostic groups. A significant effect of apoE-E4 proteotype on p-tau217 levels, after adjusting for age and sex was identified. These findings support the application of plasma AD biomarkers in the African context and the relevance of further AD biomarker research in diverse populations.

Biomarkers↗