PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16966894

Vertical bone augmentation: where are we now?

Abstract

As the prevalence of implants has increased, so has the challenge to augment the remaining osseous structure to house those implants. The biggest surgical challenge clinically is to augment lost bone vertically. The purpose of this article is to review currently available techniques for achieving greater vertical dimension before implant placement. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE to find all articles published between 1970 and 2004 regarding vertical bone augmentation. Following the literature search, all articles were reviewed and summarized in this review article of vertical bone augmentation. The results of the research showed that guided-bone regeneration, monocortical onlay grafting, and distraction osteogenesis have the potential to be applied to augment deficient areas vertically. The expectations of dimensional gain and bone quality are unique to each technique, as well as the potential complications. Distraction osteogenesis has had the greatest potential for vertical gain, while guided-bone regeneration and monocortical onlay grafting achieve similar results. The choice of procedure is to be based upon the patient's existing anatomy, degree of vertical deficiency, and willingness to participate in treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Simon Bernstein, Jason Cooke, Paul Fotek, Hom-Lay Wang. 2006. Vertical bone augmentation: where are we now?. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000226824.39526.71

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Influence of the application of platelet-enriched plasma in oral mucosal wound healing.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe and quantify the therapeutic value of platelet concentrate on the capillary density in oral mucosal wound healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects included 10 healthy edentulous patients who underwent bilaterally a sinus floor elevation procedure and a buccal onlay graft with autologous iliac crest bone for maxillary reconstruction. During surgery, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was prepared from a blood sample taken from the patient. After randomization in a split-mouth design, at one side PRP was administered in the wound and at the contralateral side a placebo. At baseline, microvascular capillary density was scored with the orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging technique and repeated measurements were performed postoperatively on a daily basis until the tenth day, after which measurements were continued weekly until the fifth postoperative week. RESULTS: Ten patients, five males and five females, were included in the study with a mean age of 54.2+/-9.1 years for females and 57.6+/-6.9 years for males. Donor platelet counts from whole blood had a mean value of 248.5+/-13.5 x 10(9)/l, while the value of platelet counts in the PRP had a mean of 975.9+/-97.9 x 10(9)/l. Wound healing was significantly accelerated in the PRP-treated mucosal wounds during the first 10 postoperative days. After the second week, no obvious differences between the PRP or placebo side could be noted. CONCLUSION: PRP has a strong stimulant effect on capillary regeneration in wound healing. These effects are mainly noticeable during the early stages of wound healing.

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation↗

Bone formation after sinus augmentation with engineered bone.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the following investigation was to quantify the resorption rate of tissue-engineered bone grafts in the maxillary sinus using volume measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sinus floor augmentation using autologous bone grafts from the iliac crest (n=17, group 1) was compared with commercially produced transplants of human cells seeded on polyglycolid-polylactid (PLGA) scaffolds (Oral Bone) (n=14, group 2). RESULTS: The total resorption rate for autologous transplants 3 months post operation was 29%, while the tissue-engineered bone showed a resorption rate of 90%. The autologous bone had a bone density of up to 266-551 Hounsfield units (HU), while sufficient mineralization of tissue-engineered bone was found in only one case (152 HU). CONCLUSION: In this clinical study, the use of autologous cancellous bone grafts in sinus augmentation was more reliable than scaffolds containing cultured osteoblasts. Further tissue-engineered bone transplants should be examined to draw general conclusions about the use of tissue-engineered grafts compared with autologous bone grafts for maxillary sinus augmentation.

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation↗