PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17083601

Indirect electrosurgery.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dipankar DE, Somesh Gupta, Amit K Malhotra. 2006. Indirect electrosurgery.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32318.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intraoral osteotomies using piezosurgery for distraction in an infant with Pierre-Robin sequence.

Airway management in infants with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is often challenging. Advancement of the tongue base using mandibular distraction in neonates can avoid tracheotomy and is increasingly propagated. The osteotomies can be performed via intra- and extraoral approaches. Nowadays, for precise bone cutting, piezosurgical devices have been introduced in maxillofacial surgery, which we used for osteotomies via the intraoral approach in the 7-week-old patient presented in this study. Instead of a preoperative CT scan, a 3D data set was generated preoperatively in the operating theatre using a 3D C-arm system. After bilateral transcutaneous pin placement and osteotomies, a second 3D data set was acquired. Primary and secondary reconstructions clearly visualized the patient's bone despite the low level of ossification in newborns and the presence of a large amount of metal implants. In view of the low level of radiation exposure going along with the 3D C-arm imaging, a follow-up examination after removal of the distractors was performed. With this report of a 7-week-old female infant with the diagnosis of PRS, we want to extend the surgical and diagnostic armamentarium for the treatment of infants with PRS.

Electrosurgery↗

Viral determinants of human papillomavirus persistence following loop electrical excision procedure treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3.

BACKGROUND: Persistent infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+) which, in the United States, is commonly treated using the loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP). Data from Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance-Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study were used to evaluate HPV persistence and reappearance after LEEP. METHODS: Cervical specimens, collected before LEEP and at 6-month study visits, were tested by L1-PCR for detection of >or=27 HPV types. HPV persistence, defined as the same HPV type being present before and 6 months after LEEP, was evaluated by: (a) genotype, (b) carcinogenicity, and (c) phylogenetic species. HPV infections that cleared post-LEEP (the complement of persistence) were followed for reappearance of the same type. RESULTS: HPV infections (n = 1,130) were detected among 481 women who underwent LEEP. Overall, 20.4% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 18.2-22.9%] of infections persisted. Assessment of heterogeneity within the three categorizations of HPV showed that phylogenetic species best fit the data. Persistence was significantly greater by HPV types in the alpha3 species [all are noncarcinogenic; 40.9% (95% CI, 31.8-50.4%)] compared with HPV types in the alpha9 (HPV16 and related types) and alpha7 species (HPV18 and related types; 17.6% and 17.9%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). HPV reappeared in 7.8% (95% CI, 6.1-9.9%) of infections that cleared after LEEP. Infections in the alpha3 species (22.6%) were the most likely to reappear compared with HPV types in the alpha9 (7.5%) and alpha7 (6.8%) species. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of HPV persistence and reappearance following LEEP were better explained by phylogenetic rather than standard classifications. HPV types likely to persist after LEEP as well as those likely to repopulate the cervical/vaginal epithelium were those in the alpha3 species, which are in effect not treated, but are not associated with cervical cancer and are unlikely to cause disease.

Electrosurgery↗

Hysteroscopic surgery.

Hysteroscopy and visually directed endometrial sampling have replaced blind curettage for the diagnosis of endometrial disease. Hysteroscopy can be used to detect endometrial cancer and various premalignant lesions, as well as to diagnose intrauterine polyps and submucous fibroids. It can also be used to locate lost intrauterine devices, assess the shape and size of the endometrial cavity during an infertility work-up and to visualise intrauterine septae and adhesions. If the hysteroscopist possesses special skills and training, it can be used to perform intrauterine sterilisation by occluding the tubal ostia. The ability to perform endometrial ablation as an alternative to hysterectomy in patients with menorrhagia has led to reduction in the number of hysterectomies performed. Long-term follow-up has confirmed the success of this procedure, but it is not without complications. The inherent dangers and complications of endometrial ablation and the considerable skill and training it requires has led to the development of numerous second-generation devices, which can involve balloons that are heated with circulating fluid, impedance-controlled endometrial ablation or surface electrodes, heated fluid running through the hysteroscope under direct vision or the use of microwaves or cryotherapy. This chapter reviews the techniques, potential complications and evidence for the effectiveness of the common diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopic procedures.

Electrosurgery↗