PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17084937

Finite element-based probabilistic analysis tool for orthopaedic applications.

Abstract

Orthopaedic implants, as well as other physical systems, contain inherent variability in geometry, material properties, component alignment, and loading conditions. While complex, deterministic finite element (FE) models do not account for the potential impact of variability on performance, probabilistic studies have typically predicted behavior from simplified FE models to achieve practical solution times. The objective of this research was to develop an efficient and versatile probabilistic FE tool to quantify the effect of uncertainty in the design variables on the performance of orthopaedic components under relevant conditions. Key aspects of the computational tool developed include parametric and automated FE model creation for changes in dimensional variables, efficient solution using the advanced mean-value (AMV) reliability method, and identification of the most significant design variables. Two orthopaedic applications are presented to demonstrate the ability of the computational tool to efficiently and accurately represent component performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sarah K Easley, Saikat Pal, Paul R Tomaszewski, Anthony J Petrella, Paul J Rullkoetter, Peter J Laz. 2006-11-07. Finite element-based probabilistic analysis tool for orthopaedic applications.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.09.013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Double-Axis Maxillary Skeletal Expander Suggests Higher Expansion Efficiency in Early Activation: A Finite Element Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional single-axis maxillary skeletal expanders (MSE) have some drawbacks, such as limited control over maxillary expansion and possible asymmetric expansion between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS). This report introduces a double-axis maxillary skeletal expander (DAMSE) concept to overcome these drawbacks and enhance the efficiency of maxillary skeletal expansion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different DAMSE designs were compared with a conventional single-axis MSE. Finite element analysis was performed to analyse their expansion efficiency, stress magnitude and distribution occurring in a simplified bone model. RESULTS: DAMSE outperformed the single-axis MSE and provided better control over ANS and PNS expansion. During early activation, the highest expansion efficiency (31.7%) was achieved by DAMSE Model V, 13% more efficient than the single-axis MSE. This efficiency was increased to 100.8% by combining the DAMSE Model V with midpalatal suture surgery. However, with the simplified bone model, the current study could not demonstrate that DAMSE can resolve the issue of asymmetric expansion between ANS and PNS. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriately designed DAMSE can be a promising tool for maxillary expansion treatment. DAMSE offers more efficient treatment than the conventional single-axis MSE while maintaining similar levels of patient comfort and invasiveness.

Finite Element Analysis↗

Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment.

BACKGROUND: An important step in finite element modeling is the process of validation to derive clinical relevant data. It can be assumed that defect states of a finite element model, which have not been validated before, may predict wrong results. The purpose of this study was to show the differences in accuracy between a calibrated and a non-calibrated finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment for different clinical defects. METHODS: For this study, two geometrically identical finite element models were used. An in vitro experiment was designed, deriving data for the calibration. Frequently used material properties were obtained from the literature and transferred into the non-calibrated model. Both models were validated on three clinical defects: bilateral hemifacetectomy, nucleotomy and interspinous defects, whereas in vitro range of motion data served as control points. Predictability and accuracy of the calibrated and non-calibrated finite element model were evaluated and compared. FINDINGS: Both finite element models could mimic the intact situation with a good agreement. In the defects, the calibrated model predicted motion behavior with excellent agreement, whereas the non-calibrated model diverged greatly. INTERPRETATION: Investigating the biomechanical performance of implants and load distribution of different spinal structures by numerical analysis requires not only good agreement with the intact segment, but also with the defect states, which are initiated prior to implant insertion. Because of more realistic results the calibration method may be recommended, however, it is more time consuming.

Finite Element Analysis↗

Vibrational analysis of mandible trauma: experimental and numerical approaches.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vibrational assessment of the mandible fracture patterns. Measurement of natural frequencies and associated vibrational mode shapes was performed to determine the relationship between the dynamic behavior of the human mandible and incidence of mandibular fractures using both in vitro modal testing and finite element analysis. Our results show that the natural frequencies of the human mandible in dry and wet conditions are 567 Hz and 501 Hz, respectively. The first vibrational mode of human mandible is a bending vibration with nodes located at the mandibular body where bone fracture is less likely to occur. By contrast, high vibration amplitudes were identified in the symphysis/parasymphysis and subcondyle regions where bone fractures tend occur. These findings indicate that the vibrational characteristics of the mandible are potential parameters for assessment of the mechanisms of injury.

Finite Element Analysis↗