PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17125921

A comparative study of quantum yield and electrical energy per order (E(Eo)) for advanced oxidative decolourisation of reactive azo dyes by UV light.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the quantum yield and electrical energy per order (E(Eo)) efficiency of Reactive Orange 4 (RO4) and Reactive Yellow 14 (RY14) azo dyes by three advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). Both dyes were completely decolourised by all these processes. The relative decolourisation efficiencies of these processes were in the following order: Fe(2+)/H(2)O(2)/UV>UV/TiO(2)>UV/H(2)O(2). The low efficiency of UV/H(2)O(2) process is mainly due to low UV absorption by hydrogen peroxide at the 365nm. The figure of merit E(Eo) values showed that UV/H(2)O(2) process consumes more electrical energy than the other two processes. The electrical energy consumption is in the following order: UV/H(2)O(2)>UV/TiO(2)>Fe(2+)/H(2)O(2)/UV. At low initial dye concentration higher quantum yield was observed in UV/TiO(2) process, whereas in photo-Fenton process higher quantum yield was observed at high initial dye concentration. The structure of dye molecule also influences the quantum yield and E(Eo) value.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Muruganandham, K Selvam, M Swaminathan. 2006-10-15. A comparative study of quantum yield and electrical energy per order (E(Eo)) for advanced oxidative decolourisation of reactive azo dyes by UV light.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.035

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dynamic modeling of an enzymatic membrane reactor for the treatment of xenobiotic compounds.

A membrane enzymatic reactor, consisting of a stirred tank coupled to an ultrafiltration membrane was set up for the enzymatic oxidation of xenobiotic compounds. The azo dye Orange II was selected for the model compound and manganese peroxidase for the oxidative enzyme. The ligninolytic cycle was initiated and maintained by the controlled addition of all factors (reactants, mediators, and stabilizers) at suitable rates. Considering the distinctiveness of this process, in which the substrate to be oxidized is not the primary substrate for the enzyme, a kinetic model was developed. The azo dye concentration and hydrogen peroxide addition rate were found to be the main factors affecting the process. The reaction kinetics was defined using a Michaelis-Menten model with respect to the Orange II concentration and a first-order linear dependence relative to the H(2)O(2) addition rate. The dynamic model, which takes into account both the kinetics and the hydraulics of the system, was validated by comparing the experimental results in continuous operation under steady and non-steady state to model predictions. In particular, the model predicted the behavior of the system when unexpected alterations in steady-state operation occurred. Furthermore, the model allowed us to obtain the most appropriate H(2)O(2)/Orange II ratio in the feed to maximize the process efficiency.

Azo Compounds↗

Highly enantioselective and diastereoselective 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions between azomethine imines and 3-acryloyl-2-oxazolidinone catalyzed by binaphthyldiimine-Ni(II) complexes.

[reaction: see text] We have found the first example of high levels of asymmetric induction (97-74% ee) along with high diastereoselectivity (>99:1-64:36) in dipole-HOMO-/dipolarophile-LUMO-controlled asymmetric 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions between fused azomethine imines and 3-acryloyl-2-oxazolidinone using a chiral BINIM-Ni(II) complex as a chiral Lewis acid catalyst.

Azo Compounds↗