PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17129200

Patient narratives: a micro-interactional analysis.

Abstract

The use of narrative as a therapeutic tool is well established in many forms of counseling and psychotherapy. Similarly, it forms a significant element of many holistic consultation approaches. The value of patient narratives are recognized by many practitioners working in primary care too, but opportunities for its utilization can be limited by the practicalities of working within conventional healthcare structures. This article presents a micro-interactional analysis of the ways in which patients routinely frame and self-manage their narratives in the context of primary care encounters, and explores some of the behavioral motifs utilized by practitioners in the management of narrative-based interactions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John Chatwin. 2006. Patient narratives: a micro-interactional analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1515/cam.2006.014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗