Empirical comparison of tests for differential expression on time-series microarray experiments.

Ernest A Fischer; Michael A Friedman; Mia K Markey

doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.10.008

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17188839

Empirical comparison of tests for differential expression on time-series microarray experiments.

Ernest A Fischer·Michael A Friedman·Mia K Markey

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Methods for identifying differentially expressed genes were compared on time-series microarray data simulated from artificial gene networks. Select methods were further analyzed on existing immune response data of Boldrick et al. (2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 972-977). Based on the simulations, we recommend the ANOVA variants of Cui and Churchill. Efron and Tibshirani's empirical Bayes Wilcoxon rank sum test is recommended when the background cannot be effectively corrected. Our proposed GSVD-based differential expression method was shown to detect subtle changes. ANOVA combined with GSVD was consistent on background-normalized simulation data. GSVD with empirical Bayes was consistent without background correction. Based on the Boldrick et al. data, ANOVA is best suited to detect changes in temporal data, while GSVD and empirical Bayes effectively detect individual spikes or overall shifts, respectively. For methods tested on simulation data, lowess after background correction improved results. On simulation data without background correction, lowess decreased performance compared to median centering.

Explore related subjects

Gene Expression Profiling Gene Regulatory Networks Methods Models, Statistical Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis Time Comparative Study Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ernest A Fischer, Michael A Friedman, Mia K Markey. 2006-12-22. Empirical comparison of tests for differential expression on time-series microarray experiments.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.10.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Protocol to predict gene expression from transcriptomic data using PREDICT.

Linking DNA sequence variation to context-specific transcriptional programs is a critical challenge in regulatory genomics, especially for non-model organisms. Here, we present PREDICT, a modular Python package for discovering cis-regulatory elements and transcription factor binding motifs. We describe steps to identify enriched k-mers from differentially expressed genes, map them to known motifs, quantify their impact on gene expression, and visualize motif co-occurrences. PREDICT provides a robust, k-mer-based approach to uncover regulatory logic in diverse genomic systems. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Yen et al. and Liu et al.1,2.

Gene Expression Profiling↗

PubMed2025

De novo transcriptome assembly and gene expression analysis of Cnidium officinale under high-temperature conditions.

BACKGROUND: The medicinal plant Cnidium officinale (CO) is widespread in Northeast Asia and vulnerable to heat stress. The naturally occurring composition of pharmacological ingredients of CO results in overall physiological consequences; therefore, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of metabolic response to ambient heat in terms of acclimation to estimate how much CO is exposed to threatening environmental conditions. RESULTS: Transcriptome analysis is critical for understanding the consequences of long-term physiological adaptation of CO to abiotic stress. However, transcriptome analysis on this species, particularly under prolonged stress conditions, has remained limited. We employed a temperature gradient tunnel (TGT) to subject CO to high-temperature exposure for four months, enabling us to observe the cumulative effects of heat and assess its acclimation mechanisms. In the absence of genome sequencing data, we performed de novo transcriptome assembly and compared DEGs from temperature treatment plots of a TGT and a growth chamber (GC). Since interpreting transcriptomic data can be complex, we employed a sequential analytical approach, including DEG clustering, GO enrichment, KEGG pathway mapping, miRNA-target gene analysis, and multiple rounds of RNA sequencing validation. DEGs were classified into two categories: genes exhibiting significant fold changes and genes showing significant count changes rather than fold changes. Then, we analyzed the functional roles of DEGs to determine which pathways respond to ambient and stressful high temperatures and validated the findings through cross-comparison with GC. Additionally, we conducted miRNA analysis to investigate post-transcriptional regulation under high temperatures. CO grown under higher ambient temperatures exhibited slight upregulation of pathways related to protein stability and turnover, ABA biosynthesis, and energy production, such as photosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation. However, under extreme heat stress, most metabolic pathways were downregulated except for those involved in transcription, translation, oxidative phosphorylation and the biosynthesis of cutin, suberin, and wax. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that proper clustering of genes based on expression levels and fold changes in two different experimental conditions, along with pathway mapping, may provide a comprehensive understanding of CO's response to heat stress. These insights could contribute to future research on heat tolerance and crop improvement.

Gene Expression Profiling↗

PubMed2025

PoweREST: Statistical power estimation for spatial transcriptomics experiments to detect differentially expressed genes between two conditions.

Recent advancements in spatial transcriptomics (ST) have significantly enhanced biological research in various domains. However, the high cost for current ST data generation techniques restricts the large-scale application of ST. Consequently, maximization of the use of available resources to achieve robust statistical power for ST data is a pressing need. One fundamental question in ST analysis is detection of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under different conditions using ST data. Such DEG analyses are performed frequently, but their power calculations are rarely discussed in the literature. To address this gap, we developed PoweREST, a power estimation tool designed to support the power calculation for DEG detection with 10X Genomics Visium data. PoweREST enables power estimation both before any ST experiments and after preliminary data are collected, making it suitable for a wide variety of power analyses in ST studies. We also provide a user-friendly, program-free web application that allows users to interactively calculate and visualize study power along with relevant parameters.

Gene Expression Profiling↗