PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17224029

Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Andreas Stavropoulos·Thorkild Karring·Lambros Kostopoulos
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare implants with a rough surface in their whole length (FR) with implants having a 2 mm coronal machined portion (PR) when used in association with a sinus-lift procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 2 mm< or =x< or =9 mm residual alveolar crest were prosthetically restored with implants after a staged sinus-lift procedure using osteotomes. In 13 randomly chosen patients, no more than one FR implant was placed (test group), while the rest were PR implants. The other 13 patients received only PR implants (control group). For comparisons, only one implant from each patient was used, i.e., from the test group only the 13 FR implants were used, while from the control group, one PR implant was randomly chosen. The presence/absence of plaque, BOP, PPD and REC were registered at the day of delivery of the restorations and after 1 year. Residual alveolar crest height and marginal bone levels around the implants were evaluated on standardized periapical radiographs taken at various stages. RESULTS: Four FR and two PR implants were lost, and the cumulative survival rate was 82.9% (six lost out of 35). There were no significant differences between the two groups. Implant type, residual alveolar crest height, time of osseointegration, time of implant loading and smoking did not seem to influence implant survival. CONCLUSIONS: FR and PR implants placed in augmented sinuses did not differ in their clinical performance.

Explore related subjects

Alveolar ProcessAlveolar Ridge AugmentationBone TransplantationDental AbutmentsDental ImplantsDental PlaqueDental Prosthesis DesignDental Restoration FailureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGingival HemorrhageGingival RecessionHumansMaleMaxillaMaxillary SinusMiddle AgedOsseointegrationOsteotomyPeriodontal PocketSurface PropertiesSurvival AnalysisComparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Stavropoulos, Thorkild Karring, Lambros Kostopoulos. 2007. Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01289.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Remodeling the dentofacial skeleton: the biological basis of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.

Orthodontic tooth movement is dependent upon the remodeling of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone by mechanical means. Facial sutures are also fibrous articulations, and by remodeling these joints, one can alter the positional relationships of the bones of the facial skeleton. As might be expected from the structure and mobility of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), this articulation is more resistant to mechanical deformation, and whether functional mandibular displacement can alter the growth of the condyle remains controversial. Clinical investigations of the effects of the Andresen activator and its variants on dentofacial growth suggest that the changes are essentially dento-alveolar. However, with the popularity of active functional appliances, such as the Herbst and twin-block based on 'jumping the bite', attention has focused on how they achieve dentofacial change. Animal experimentation enables informed decisions to be made regarding the effects of orthodontic treatment on the facial skeleton at the tissue, cellular, and molecular levels. Both rat and monkey models have been widely used, and the following conclusions can be drawn from such experimentation: (1) Facial sutures readily respond to changes in their mechanical environment; (2) anterior mandibular displacement in rat models does not increase the mitotic activity of cells within the condyle to be of clinical significance, and (3) mandibular displacement in non-human primates initiates remodeling activity within the TMJ and can alter condylar growth direction. This last conclusion may have clinical utility, particularly in an actively growing child.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed2007

Effects of occlusal stimuli on alveolar/jaw bone formation.

Occlusion is known to influence the growth and development of the craniofacial complex. However, the consequences of occlusal hypofunction, or its recovery, on the amount of formation and development of alveolar bone and the jaw are not fully understood. Therefore, the present study was designed to elucidate the relationship between the occlusal stimuli and alveolar and jaw bone growth by the use of a hypofunction/recovered occlusal function model in growing rats. Bone histomorphometric analyses, including bone apposition rate and mineral apposition rate, were evaluated in double-labeled frontal sections of mandibular second molars. Results showed that occlusal hypofunction significantly suppressed alveolar and jaw bone formation compared with that in animals growing normally (p < 0.05). However, recovered occlusal function induced an enhancement in jaw bone formation. These results indicate the influence of occlusal function on alveolar and jaw bone formation during the growth period.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed2007

Presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) therapy in the treatment of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft and palate (UCLP). DESIGN: A prospective study with blinded measurements. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with UCLP treated from 1997 to 2003. INTERVENTIONS: The starting age for PNAM therapy was 26 days and the average length of the therapy was 110 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measurements of intraoral and extraoral casts were made, and statistical analyses were used to compare the differences between pre- and posttherapy measurements. RESULTS: After PNAM therapy, there was a statistically significant decrease in both intersegment alveolar cleft distance and columellar deviation (p < .05). There was also a statistically significant increase in cleft nostril height, maxillary width, and columellar width (p < .05). Moreover, although there was no statistically significant reduction of the affected nostril width, it demonstrated on average 1.7-mm reduction after PNAM therapy. The length of the time the patient utilized the appliance and postmolding nostril height were found to have a statistically significant positive correlation (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: PNAM therapy decreases intersegment alveolar cleft distance while permitting an increase in posterior maxillary arch width. It also increases nasal symmetry by decreasing columellar deviation, increasing nostril height on the affected side, maintaining bialar width of nose, increasing columellar width, and creating more symmetrical nostril heights and widths. The improvement of the height of the cleft nostril was correlated with the time the appliance was applied.

Alveolar Process↗