PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1763162

Fakability of two different role-play methodologies for assessing assertion.

J M Kern·S J Karten
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The fakability of two methodologically different role-play tests of assertion was examined, 30 undergraduates low in assertiveness were tested and retested on the Behavioral Assertiveness Test--Revised and the Idiographic Role-play Test. Half of the testees were instructed to fake assertion during the second testing. Analysis indicated that both tests were fakable; however, testees reported more difficulty faking the latter test than the former. The detection of faking may be possible, particularly on role-play tests employing an idiographic methodology.

Explore related subjects

AssertivenessData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansInterpersonal RelationsReproducibility of ResultsRole PlayingSurveys and QuestionnairesComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Kern, S J Karten. 1991. Fakability of two different role-play methodologies for assessing assertion.. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.467

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Making communication research matter: what do patients notice, what do patients want, and what do patients need?

OBJECTIVE: To explore limitations of current communication theory by considering different perspectives of researchers, clinicians, patients and teachers of communication. METHOD: Theory development based on limitations of the current communication research literature due to inconsistencies between patient reports and observed communication behavior. RESULTS: While researchers focus on the mechanics and techniques of communication, patients seek relationships in which they experience trust, the right amount of autonomy, caring, and expertise. Patients', physicians', and communication experts' perspectives do not always define the same problems and often point to different solutions. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to studying clinician behaviors and patient perceptions of care, communication research should focus on five additional factors: what patients notice, want and need, and how their perspectives differ from those of physicians and researchers; the context, including illness severity and type and family influences; how complex health systems facilitate and impede communication; patients' influences on physician communication behavior; and habits of mind that promote attentive care.

Assertiveness↗
PubMed2006

Using an executive coach to increase leadership effectiveness.

Senior executive nursing roles demand excellence and rigor in both the technical and interpersonal domains of leadership. Many nurse leaders have begun seeking innovative self-development programs and practices to assist them as they strive to improve their effectiveness as leaders in complex organizations. One practice that has gained in popularity is that of engaging a leadership "coach." To understand this relatively new trend in healthcare leadership, the authors interviewed 4 coaches and 4 nurse leaders who had been coached. In this article, they present their overall findings about the effectiveness of coaching as a leadership development tool and offer recommendations for leaders who are interested in engaging a coach.

Assertiveness↗