PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1770848

A database coding system for vascular procedures.

Abstract

A coding system was developed to overcome the difficulties encountered in data registry and retrieval from a national audit. In vascular surgery operations are frequently combined, and neither the OHIP fee schedule of codes (Ontario, Canada) nor the ICD-9 system provides sufficient detail for most vascular surgeons to retrieve information for long-term follow-up. However, some wish to record minimal data on their operative procedures. A numeric classification system was developed. A five-digit number is used, the first two digits classifying the operative procedure and anatomic details. Two decimal digits code the classification of operation (e.g., aortic aneurysm, tube graft, aortoiliac, or aortobifemoral) and the final digit may be used as a modifier. "Holes" in the numeric system allow for new operations to be added as they develop. Codes are stored in a database with the following fields: 1) codes; 2) description of operation; 3) translation. The translation field may be modified to permit translation of any existing databases into the system. This database has been distributed with a data registry program free of charge to vascular surgeons in Canada to allow nationwide registry of vascular surgery patients. A numeric code eliminates spelling and abbreviation errors, and can be sufficiently broad-based to allow all surgeons to participate in a nationwide audit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K A Harris, G DeRose, W Jamieson. A database coding system for vascular procedures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1770848/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The comprehensiveness of Medline and Embase computer searches. Searches for controlled trials of homoeopathy, ascorbic acid for common cold and ginkgo biloba for cerebral insufficiency and intermittent claudication.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the comprehensiveness of Medline and Embase computer searches for controlled trials. DESIGN: Comparison of articles found after an exhaustive search of the literature with the yield of a Medline or Embase search. This was performed for controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of three interventions: homoeopathy, ascorbic acid for common cold, and ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication and cerebral insufficiency. The number of controlled trials found by exhaustive search of the literature was 107, 61 and 45, respectively. RESULTS: For homoeopathy, ascorbic acid and ginkgo the proportion of all trials found by Medline was 17%, 36% and 31% respectively and for Embase 13%, 25% and 58% respectively. After checking of the references in the Medline articles 44%, 79% and 76% of all trials were identified. After checking of the references in the Embase articles 42%, 72% and 93% of all trials were identified. About 20% of the articles was not correctly indexed. Of the best trials 68%, 91% and 83% could be found with Medline and 55%, 82% and 92% of the best trials were identified through Embase. CONCLUSIONS: For the topics mentioned, Medline and Embase searches are sufficient to get an impression of the evidence from controlled trials, but only if references in the articles are followed for further evidence. If one wants to get a more complete picture, additional search strategies make sense. Of course, this picture may be different for other topics.

Abstracting and Indexing