PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1786333

Confidence intervals and sample sizes.

A P Grieve
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a recent paper, Beal (1989, Biometrics 45, 969-977) considers the problem of determining the appropriate sample size when inference about a parameter theta is to be made on the basis of a confidence interval (CI). He suggests that the sample size should be chosen so that the probability that the length of the CI is less than a given value, conditional on the interval including the true theta, is greater than a specified level. In this note, in which we concentrate on two-sided intervals, this suggestion is examined, as is the effect of uncertainty in our knowledge of the population variance sigma 2 on estimates of sample size.

Explore related subjects

BiometryClinical Trials as TopicConfidence IntervalsHumansProbabilitySampling StudiesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A P Grieve. 1991. Confidence intervals and sample sizes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1786333/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry↗