PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1788357

The preparticipation evaluation.

Abstract

The preparticipation evaluation (PPE) is the first step toward meeting the responsibility of maintaining the health and safety of the athlete. The ideal timing for the PPE is 6 weeks prior to the competitive season to allow adequate time for treatment and rehabilitation of problems. It is suggested that a complete screening evaluation be performed prior to entrance into a new level of school with annual limited reevaluations thereafter. The annual reevaluation should focus on the medical history with the physical examination emphasizing the cardiovascular system and interim injuries and medical problems. Currently, there are no data to support routine screening laboratory, radiographic, or cardiovascular testing in the asymptomatic athlete with an unremarkable history and normal examination. Two different methods for performing the PPE can be used (station-type mass screening and office setting), with each having its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. The most important and difficult decision for the physician screening young athletes is determining clearance for activity. Guidelines based on the demands of the sport and specific medical problems have been established; however, the physician's clinical judgement should be used in interpreting these recommendations for each individual athlete. The PPE is an excellent opportunity for the physician to positively influence the health care and safety of a local sports program. Through genuine interest, thorough evaluation, and knowledgeable counseling, the athlete will develop confidence in the evaluating physician. This confidence can translate into a good relationship and hopefully this interaction will encourage the athlete to trust the physician's judgement and seek early evaluation and treatment for problems that arise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Smith, J A Lombardo, J B Robinson. 1991. The preparticipation evaluation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1788357/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing local influence in principal component analysis with application to haematology study data.

In many medical and health studies, high-dimensional data are often encountered. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a commonly used technique to reduce such data to a few components that includes most of the information provided by the original data. However, PCA is known to be very sensitive to some abnormal observations. Therefore, it is essential to assess such sensitivity in PCA. In this paper, the assessments of local influence based on generalized influence function are developed under the case-weights and additive perturbation schemes, along with a discussion of the perturbation scheme and the generalized influence function approach. When perturbing different variables of the data, it is noted that the directions of the largest joint local influence for the eigenvalues are all the same. Moreover, these directions are completely determined by the score values of the observations, to which an approximate cut-off point is given. The proposed methods are applied to analyse a set of haematology study data for illustration. Results add new insights in finding influential observations in the studied data set.

Health Status↗

Quality of life in nonallergic rhinitis.

Health-related quality-of-life questionnaires are instruments to assess the burden of a disease as perceived by the patient. Few data are available on the health-related quality of life of patients with nonallergic rhinitis, but data from studies of patients with allergic rhinitis show that rhinitis predominantly affects mental quality of life. This burden of rhinitis is associated with impaired sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness, concentration problems, and increased irritability.

Health Status↗