PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1802689

Procedures and computer program for deriving the Ferguson plot from electrophoresis in a single pore gradient gel: application to agarose gel and a polystyrene particle.

Abstract

This study presents a computerized evaluation of pore gradient gel electrophoretograms to arrive at estimates for both the particle-free mobility and retardation coefficient, which is related to particle size. Agarose pore gradient gels ranging from 0.2 to 1.1% agarose were formed. Gel gradients were stabilized during their formation by a density gradient of 0-20% 5-(N-2,3-dihydroxypropylacetamido)- 2,4,6-triiodo-N,N'bis-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-isophthalamide (Nycodenz). Densitometry of gelled-in Bromophenol Blue showed that these pore gradients exhibited a linear central segment and were reproducible. Migration distances of polystyrene sulfate microspheres (36.5 nm radius) in agarose pore gradient gel electrophoresis were determined by time-lapse photography at several durations of electrophoresis. These migration distances were evaluated as a function of migration time as previously reported (D. Tietz, Adv. Electrophoresis 1988, 2, 109-169). Although this is not necessarily required, the mathematical approach used in this study assumed linearity of both the pore gradient and the Ferguson plot for reasons of simplicity. The data evaluation on the basis of the extended Ogston model is incorporated in a user-friendly program, GRADFIT, which is designed for personal computers (Macintosh). The results obtained are compared with (1) conventional electrophoresis using several gels of single concentration with and without Nycodenz, and (ii) a different mathematical approach for the analysis of gradient gels (Rodbard et al., Anal. Biochem. 1971, 40, 135-157). Moreover, a simple procedure for evaluating linear pore gradient gels using linear regression analysis is presented. It is concluded that the values of particle-free mobility and retardation coefficient derived from pore gradient gel electrophoresis using the different mathematical methods are statistically indistinguishable from each other. However, these values are different, albeit close, to those obtained from conventional Ferguson plots. One of the possible reasons for this relatively minor discrepancy is that the particle-free mobility changed slightly during electrophoresis, which has a different effect on electrophoresis in homogeneous gels (single time measurement) and pore gradient gels (multiple time measurements). The characterization of particles according to size and charge by pore gradient electrophoresis provides a significant operational simplification and sample economy compared to that requiring the use of several gel concentrations, although at the price of increased requirements of instrumentation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Tietz, E Gombocz, A Chrambach. 1991. Procedures and computer program for deriving the Ferguson plot from electrophoresis in a single pore gradient gel: application to agarose gel and a polystyrene particle.. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150121005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Covariates-dependent confidence intervals for the difference or ratio of two median survival times.

In this paper, we are concerned with the estimation of the discrepancy between two treatments when right-censored survival data are accompanied with covariates. Conditional confidence intervals given the available covariates are constructed for the difference between or ratio of two median survival times under the unstratified and stratified Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The proposed confidence intervals provide the information about the difference in survivorship for patients with common covariates but in different treatments. The results of a simulation study investigation of the coverage probability and expected length of the confidence intervals suggest the one designed for the stratified Cox model when data fit reasonably with the model. When the stratified Cox model is not feasible, however, the one designed for the unstratified Cox model is recommended. The use of the confidence intervals is finally illustrated with a HIV+ data set.

Confidence Intervals↗

Inferences on standardized mean difference: the generalized variable approach.

The standardized mean difference has been widely used as the most common index of effect magnitude in many applied fields. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using the concept of generalized variable for the confidence interval estimation and hypothesis testing of standardized mean difference. Furthermore, we extend this approach to compare standardized mean differences between two studies or between two strata. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach can provide confidence intervals with excellent coverage properties and can perform hypothesis testing with satisfactory type-I error control.

Confidence Intervals↗

Interval estimation for rank correlation coefficients based on the probit transformation with extension to measurement error correction of correlated ranked data.

The Spearman (rho(s)) and Kendall (tau) rank correlation coefficient are routinely used as measures of association between non-normally distributed random variables. However, confidence limits for rho(s) are only available under the assumption of bivariate normality and for tau under the assumption of asymptotic normality of tau. In this paper, we introduce another approach for obtaining confidence limits for rho(s) or tau based on the arcsin transformation of sample probit score correlations. This approach is shown to be applicable for an arbitrary bivariate distribution. The arcsin-based estimators for rho(s) and tau (denoted by rho(s,a), tau(a)) are shown to have asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of 9/pi2 compared with the usual estimators rho(s) and tau when rho(s) and tau are, respectively, 0. In some nutritional applications, the Spearman rank correlation between nutrient intake as assessed by a reference instrument versus nutrient intake as assessed by a surrogate instrument is used as a measure of validity of the surrogate instrument. However, if only a single replicate (or a few replicates) are available for the reference instrument, then the estimated Spearman rank correlation will be downwardly biased due to measurement error. In this paper, we use the probit transformation as a tool for specifying an ANOVA-type model for replicate ranked data resulting in a point and interval estimate of a measurement error corrected rank correlation. This extends previous work by Rosner and Willett for obtaining point and interval estimates of measurement error corrected Pearson correlations.

Confidence Intervals↗