PubMed · 1822818
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C Hassager, C Christiansen. 1991. Current techniques for bone mass measurement.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80288-3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: The investigation of the effect of time and type of menopause on bone mineral density (BMD) at different ages. METHODS: Five hundred and fourteen women, who had never received any hormonal substitution were studied in a cross-sectional design: 177 with normal (NMP), 210 with surgical (SUMP) and 127 with premature natural (EMP) menopause. Age at menopause was 49.1+/-3.9, 38.3+/-4.7 and 38.1+/-4.2 years (mean+/-1 S.D.), respectively. BMD was measured at L2-L4 vertebrae and proximal femur by the DEXA method. RESULTS: EMP women presented significantly lower vertebral BMD than NMP women in the 45-55-years segments (P<0.001), but did not differ from SUMP women. This group exhibited lower vertebral BMD than NMP between 45 and 50 years (P<0.001). Regarding femoral neck, EMP women exhibited lower values than SUMP in the 45-50 and 55-65 age segments (P<0.001) whereas SUMP women presented significantly higher BMD values than NMP women after 55 years of age (P<0.001). The percentages of women with vertebral BMD (T-score values) in the osteoporotic range were significantly greater in EMP compared with either NMP or SUMP groups (both P<0.001) whereas in femoral neck lower in SUMP than the other two categories. CONCLUSIONS: Women with either natural or surgical premature menopause exhibit lower BMD of trabecular bone compared with normal menopause women at the age segments 45-55 and 45-50, respectively. However, surgical menopause women exceed normal menopause women in their mixed bone BMD values after 60 years as well as premature natural menopause women at almost all age segments.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the predictive value of bone mineral density measurements done as early as months 3 and 6 after initiation of alendronate therapy (10 mg daily) in osteoporotic women already using long-term hormone replacement therapy. METHOD: Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone density (DPX by Lunar) were performed at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months of combined therapy. The study group included 45 women at baseline, but 2 dropped-out at day 67 and at month 6 because of gastric complaints, leaving 43 women for analyses. RESULTS: Group characteristics at baseline were as follows: mean age 61+/-5 years, mean duration of HRT use 7+/-3 years, lumbar spine bone density 0.863+/-0.089 g/cm(2), with a t-score of -2.75+/-0.8 S.D., and femoral neck density 0.706+/-0.085 g/cm(2) with a t-score of -2.28+/-0.7 S.D. Bone density increased during 1 year of combined therapy, totaling a 3.2% gain for the spine and a 2.4% gain for the femur. Most of the annual change was already observed at month 3: 2.1% for the spine and 1.4% for the femur. Moreover, the baseline to month 6 percentage difference showed a very good correlation with the yearly outcome (r=0.74, P<0.001 for both spine and femur). When different arbitrary cut-off definitions for a successful treatment (1%, 1.5% or 2% gain in density) were used in analyses, in the majority of cases the bone density at 1 year, whether elevated or not, could be predicted by months 3 and 6 results. Although urine deoxypyridinoline decreased throughout the study period, demonstrating a significant time trend (P=0.001), the baseline to month 3 changes did not correlate with baseline to annual bone density results. CONCLUSIONS: In specific clinical settings when patients or physicians are looking for a good way to anticipate whether additional alendronate in hormone users would turn out to be beneficial, bone density measurements performed as early as 3-6 months after initiation of therapy might give the answer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.