PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1824879

TMJ syndrome: is it compensable?

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) syndrome has only recently surfaced as a workers' compensation or auto accident claim in the insurance industry. It usually appears as a secondary problem to cervical injuries. Further research is needed to establish guidelines for determining whether TMJ syndrome is compensable, but a survey of healthcare practitioners who deal with TMJ--such as the one described in this article--can help in making a determination until guidelines are established. In early 1990, the American Academy of Craniomandibular Disorders and the American Dental Association published guidelines; however, these guidelines address only diagnosis and treatment (Independent Medical and Dental Consultants, Inc., 1990). Further information is needed concerning TMJ's causes and whether the condition should be compensated. Sixty survey questionnaires were sent out to dentists and oral surgeons to identify causes of TMJ, symptoms, diagnostic methods, and treatment. The primary question for which the survey sought an answer was how to judge whether a person with a cervical injury complicated by TMJ syndrome should be compensated for TMJ problems. The remaining questions and answers concerned the medical management of patients with TMJ syndrome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Doerrer, F Figart. TMJ syndrome: is it compensable?. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.1991.tb01168.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

National Stroke Association guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks.

OBJECTIVE: Transient ischemic attacks are common and important harbingers of subsequent stroke. Management varies widely, and most published guidelines have not been updated in several years. We sought to create comprehensive, unbiased, evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with transient ischemic attacks. METHODS: Fifteen expert panelists were selected based on objective criteria, using publication metrics that predicted nomination by practitioners in the field. Prior published guidelines were identified through systematic review, and recommendations derived from them were rated independently for quality by the experts. Highest quality recommendations were selected and subsequently edited by the panelists using a modified Delphi approach with multiple iterations of questionnaires to reach consensus on new changes. Experts were provided systematic reviews of recent clinical studies and were asked to justify wording changes based on new evidence and to rate the final recommendations based on level of evidence and quality. No expert was allowed to contribute to recommendations on a topic for which there could be any perception of a conflict of interest. RESULTS: Of 257 guidelines documents identified by systematic review, 13 documents containing 137 recommendations met all entry criteria. Six iterations of questionnaires were required to reach consensus on wording of 53 final recommendations. Final recommendations covered initial management, evaluation, medical treatment, surgical treatment, and risk factor management. INTERPRETATION: The final recommendations on the care of patients with transient ischemic attacks emphasize the importance of urgent evaluation and treatment. The novel approach used to develop these guidelines is feasible, allows for rapid updating, and may reduce bias.

Health Planning Guidelines↗

Research recommendations for the american telemedicine association.

The American Telemedicine Association (ATA) convened a panel of experts to generate a research agenda for the telemedicine community to further support and promote the long-term acceptance and use of telehealth. Three principles to guide research and four key areas within which research is greatly needed were identified. These four areas are technical, clinical, human factors and ergonomics, and economic analyses. It is the hope of the panel that the research recommendations put forth in this document will give investigators the inspiration, tools and goals to make this happen.

Health Planning Guidelines↗