PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1865543

Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors affecting the knowledge base of practicing internists. DESIGN: An 82-item multiple-choice examination with questions from the 1988 American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certifying examination was used to assess the knowledge base of 289 internists. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were selected from among practicing internists in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania who had received ABIM certification 5 to 15 years previously. RESULTS: significant inverse correlation (r = -.30) was found between examination scores and the number of years elapsed since certification. Knowledge declined sharply within 15 years of certification. In addition, procedure-oriented subspecialists (cardiologists and gastroenterologists) had lower scores than other internists in this examination of general medical knowledge. Multivariate analyses showed that independent variables that predicted test performance were initial ABIM certifying examination score, time elapsed since certification, subspecialty classification, medical school type, and residency type. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the recent decision for time-limited certification of internists and raise questions related to content and standard setting for recertification examinations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P G Ramsey, J D Carline, T S Inui, E B Larson, J P LoGerfo, J J Norcini, M D Wenrich. 1991-08-28. Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1865543/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗