PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1929494

Sleeping position and rectal temperature.

Abstract

The effects of sleeping position upon body temperature were assessed by continuous monitoring of rectal temperature in 137 babies sleeping at home under conditions chosen by their parents. There were three groups of subjects: (1) normal babies aged 12-22 weeks whose temperature rhythms were developed, (2) normal babies aged 6-12 weeks who were developing their night time temperature rhythms, and (3) babies the night after diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus immunisation, whose temperature rhythms were disturbed. Sleeping in the prone position was not associated with higher rectal temperatures at any time of night in young babies, nor did it exaggerate the disturbance of rectal temperature rhythm after immunisation. In older normal babies the prone position did not disturb rectal temperature in the first part of the night, though prone sleepers warmed a little faster prior to walking, especially in warm conditions. Prone sleepers were, however, born earlier in gestation and tended to be of lower birth weight. Normal babies can therefore thermoregulate effectively whatever their sleeping posture, even in warm conditions, though the prone position may make it slightly more difficult to lose heat. It is difficult to see how the prone position, even interacting with warm conditions, could induce lethal hyperthermia in otherwise normal babies. Perhaps the prone position is associated with other risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Petersen, E S Anderson, M Lodemore, D Rawson, M P Wailoo. 1991. Sleeping position and rectal temperature.. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.66.8.976

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cot death.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bedding and Linens

Environment of infants during sleep and risk of the sudden infant death syndrome: results of 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths Regional Coordinators and Researchers.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of sleeping arrangements as risk factors for the sudden infant death syndrome after a national risk reduction campaign. DESIGN: Two year population based case-control study. Parental interviews were conducted for each infant who died and for four controls matched for age and date of interview. SETTING: Three regions in England with a total population of 17 million people. SUBJECTS: 195 babies who died and 780 matched controls. RESULTS: Prone and side sleeping positions both carried increased risks of death compared with supine when adjusted for maternal age, parity, gestation, birth weight, exposure to smoke, and other relevant factors in the sleeping environment (multivariate odds ratio = 9.00 (95% confidence interval 2.84 to 28.47) and 1.84 (1.02 to 3.31), respectively). The higher incidence of side rather than prone sleeping led to a higher population attributable risk (side 18.4%, prone 14.2%). More of the infants who died were found with bed covers over their heads (21.58; 6.21 to 74.99). The use of a dummy had an apparent protective effect (0.38; 0.21 to 0.70). Bed sharing for the whole night was a significant risk factor for infants whose mothers smoked (9.25; 2.31 to 34.02). No protective effect of breast feeding could be identified on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of certain risk factors for the sudden infant death syndrome and identifies others-for example, covers over the head, side sleeping position-which may be amenable to change by educating and informing parents and health care professionals.

Bedding and Linens

Full body forced air warming: commercial blanket vs air delivery beneath bed sheets.

PURPOSE: Single-use commercial forced air warming blankets serve only to distribute heated air from a blower. Standard bed sheets may be equally effective in delivering hot air within a lower body field and at lower cost. METHODS: Heated forced air at 38 degrees and 43 degrees was delivered within a simulated full-body field beneath standard hospital bed sheets or via a BAIR Model 315 commercial blanket. The air temperatures maintained within, as well as the caloric uptake of standard bodies containing 1000 ml water, were studied under standard simulated operating room conditions. Thermal input was provided by one Bair Hugger Model 500 Warming Unit and hospital acquisition cost for materials were calculated. RESULTS: Air temperatures measured within the full body field at the three test sites were as great or greater using bed sheets (33.4-35.8 degrees) as with the commercial blanket (31.1-33.9 degrees), in spite of the 5 degrees cooler outlet temperature air settings @ 38 degrees vs 43 degrees, respectively (P = 0.003). Forced air delivered beneath bed sheets heated standardized thermal bodies twice as effectively as commercial blankets using identically warmed (38 degrees) forced air and heated as well as, or better, at the 38 degrees setting than did the commercial blanket at the 43 degrees setting. Calculated acquisition costs for sheets vs commercial blankets were $0.76 vs $18.00 US, respectively. CONCLUSION: The simplicity, efficacy and economy of containing 38 degrees warm air beneath bed-sheets offer several advantages over commercial blankets and warrant further study.

Bedding and Linens