PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1933555

[Elastomers and peripheral seal in complete maxillary dentures].

Abstract

First the various physical factors involved in retention are discussed. Adhesion is designed by the Gibert formula: [formula: see text] bringing the notion of interfacial surface delimited by the fluid meniscus (epsilon) and the thickness of the salivary film at the site of formation of the meniscus (h). Atmospheric pressure plays a role by the formation of a periphery seal ensuring the creation of a depression of the interfacial fluid in order to oppose the forces of pulling. As a summary, it is important to achieve the formation of a salivary meniscus: with the smallest curvature; continuous despite the mobility of the mucosa; beyond the limit between the free mucosa and the attached mucosa and the "farthest" possible from this area. The purpose of recording the periphery borders is to obtain the highest and widest possible denture flanges without any over-extension or over-thickness. The authors then propose performing a comparative study of the various materials available for recording the periphery of maxillary full dentures, in order to determine which best responds to the criteria of quality mentioned. Several recording techniques are possible, depending on the material used: either a segmented border recording (widely described); or a recording of the periphery seal in one or several stages which is then illustrated by the use of Impregum. For each patient, recordings of the periphery was made according to a protocol always identical and precise; only the material used for this purpose (Kerr compound, regular Neo-Plex and Impregum) varied. The measure taken from these recordings showed that Impregum demonstrates the highest and thickness borders as opposed to Neo-Plex and Kerr compound which provided intermediary results. Thus, Impregum appears to be the material of choice for the optimal recording of the functional periphery seal in maxillary full dentures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Naser, M Postaire. 1991. [Elastomers and peripheral seal in complete maxillary dentures].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1933555/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How does it work?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dental Impression Materials↗

[A new method of imprint receiving for non-removable dentures].

An original method of precision imprint receiving is described that provides high dimensional precision under maximal dynamic pressure on impression material and its penetration into gingival crevice. Comparison of the new method of imprint receiving with different traditional methods of impression making for non-removable dentures is made.

Dental Impression Materials↗

[Full arch impression techniques utilizing addition type poly vinyl siloxane for fabrication of tooth born fixed partial dentures].

A precise impression is necessary for fabricating an accurately fitting cast restoration. For this purpose, Polyvinyl Siloxane (PVS) impression materials are extremely popular because of their combination of excellent physical properties, handling characteristics and dimensional stability. Its excellent clinical features remain unaffected if simple measures are guarded. This review presents several impression techniques using PVS and recommends the one that provides the most accurate impression, utilizing the superior qualities of the PVS. The one step impression technique where no control of wash bulk and thickness exists, is considered to be the least accurate impression method with measured discrepancies as large as 7 times the original inter preparation distance and 40 times the original cross arch dimensions. Furthermore, the direct contact between the less refined putty material and the tooth preparation, as well as the high prevalence of air bubble entrapment, seriously compromises restoration longevity. The two stage impression technique has proved to produce the most accurate and reliable impressions due to complete control of the wash bulk and thickness entailed. The ideal wash bulk thickness should range between 1 to 2.5 mm all around the abutment tooth in order to minimize distortion of its subsequent die. Using a "Putty Tray" at the first stage with a predetermined space encircling the abutments will allow the wash to flow to its ideal uniform bulk size at the second stage. A uniform bulk size will prevent differential setting contraction and uneven changes at the dimensions of the die. The easiest and most clinically applicable method to achieve the desired space around the preparations is by loading the Putty material with the temporary crowns in place, followed by their removal at the second stage and occupation of the created space by the wash. In general, less control of wash bulk will result in either insufficient or excessive wash material which will determine uneven dimensional changes in the impression. This, in turn, will produce ill fitting cast restoration.

Dental Impression Materials↗