PubMed · 1936393
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E H Helfgen, U Stammen. 1991. [Genotype in dental function morphology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1936393/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In this study, 20 patients were evaluated. Ten were treated with intraoral distalization followed by fixed appliance therapy, and 10 were treated with extra oral traction followed by fixed appliance therapy. Molar relationship correction was achieved in 2.5 months with intraoral distalization and in 10.7 months with extraoral distalization. A significant anterior movement of the anchorage unit (P <.001) was observed with the intraoral distalization and a significant distal drift of premolars was observed in the headgear group (P <.05). Palatal plane was found to tip downward significantly in the headgear group (P <.05). Total outcome of the 2 methods were discussed evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 distalization methods.
A case report of the orthodontic treatment of a male adolescent with a Class I bimaxillary protrusive malocclusion, complicated by a vertical growth pattern and high mandibular plane angle. Treatment consisted of extraction of maxillary second premolars, mandibular first premolars, use of a transpalatal bar, occipital pull headgear, and light wire mechanics. An acceptable result was achieved, with a decrease in the facial axis, decrease in lip strain, and an attractive full smile. This case report was presented to the American Board of Orthodontics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the certification process conducted by the Board.
In the mixed dentition, arch length preservation, maintaining the leeway space, can often provide adequate space to resolve lower incisor crowding. Yet the frequency of this occurrence is not known. To obtain this information, lingual arches were placed in the mandibular arches of 107 consecutive mixed dentition patients with incisor crowding to preserve arch length and make the leeway space available to resolve the crowding. Arch length decreased only 0.44 mm whereas the intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar dimensions increased between 0.72 and 2.27 mm. There was adequate space to resolve the crowding in 65 (60%) of the 107 patients. If perfect arch length preservation had occurred, there would have been adequate space to resolve the crowding in 73 (68%) of the 107 patients. The correlation between leeway space and tooth size-arch size discrepancy was only 0.44.