PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1955200

Toward a movement dynamics perspective on dual-task performance.

Abstract

The effect of practice on the parallel organization and control of discrete, asymmetrical bimanual movements was investigated. Subjects performed a flexion movement in the left limb together with a flexion-extension-flexion movement in the right limb. Two groups, one of which received kinematic information feedback, were instructed to produce the different patterns simultaneously. A third group performed each movement in isolation at all times, serving as the baseline condition. The degree of success in parallel action organization was assessed at the qualitative (or structural) and quantitative (or metrical) level of movement specification. Findings revealed that the bimanual groups displayed a tendency to synchronize the patterns of motor output, resulting in (mutual) interference. However,the provision of augmented kinematic information feedback resulted in more successful metrical and structural dissociation of the limb actions. The results are discussed in support of a movement dynamics perspective on motoric dual-task performance. The relevance of the approach for human factors is also emphasized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S P Swinnen, C B Walter. 1991. Toward a movement dynamics perspective on dual-task performance.. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089103300401

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching?

Kinematic studies have indicated that when a subject reaches to grasp an object, the movement consists of two primary components: (a) a transport phase whereby the hand is brought towards the object and (b) a grip phase whereby the hand changes shape in anticipation of the grasp. Using a visual perturbation paradigm, we investigated the effect of different grip component strategies upon the transport phase. The distal strategy was determined by the size of the object to be grasped: for the small object (1.5 cm o.d.) subjects naturally adopted a precision grip between the index finger and thumb; for the large object (6 cm o.d.) subjects used a whole hand prehensile grip. During 20% of the reaching trials the perturbation was introduced by unexpectedly changing the object size. The results showed that corrections to the distal program in response to the perturbation were preceded by changes in the deceleration phase of the proximal component. The data supported previous findings of two visuo-motor channels for this prehensile movement but indicated that when unanticipated shifts of only the distal program are required, both channels show modifications.

Acceleration