PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1967012

Measuring codependents' close relationships: a preliminary study.

Abstract

A survey of clinical literature and input from addiction counselors yielded eight commonly assumed characteristics of codependents' relationships. These were defined in a manner amenable to measurement by the Acquaintance Description Form (Wright, 1985), and added to the standard form to provide a codependent version (ADF-C2). Forty-one women and 19 men awaiting or beginning codependent counseling responded to the ADF-C2, and to Friel's Codependency Assessment Inventory and forms soliciting background information. Thirty-nine women and 30 men from the general population provided a comparison group. Although tentative, results were encouraging concerning progress toward measuring codependents' relationships. Broad profiles for both women and men supported the foundational observation that codependents maintain strong commitments to their partners notwithstanding stress and unrewardingness. Specifically, codependent women showed five expected characteristics: Control, Exaggerated Responsibility, Worth Dependency, Rescue Orientation, and Change Orientation. Codependent men showed two: Control and Exaggerated Responsibility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P H Wright, K D Wright. 1990. Measuring codependents' close relationships: a preliminary study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-3289(10)80005-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Drink, drugs and dentistry--are you at risk?

My long love affair with alcohol started at seventeen, when I had my first serious drink. I never saw it as a problem, it was just a way of dealing with all my other ones.

Alcoholism

Multiple primary esophageal and concurrent upper aerodigestive tract cancer and the aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotype of Japanese alcoholics.

BACKGROUND: Multiple intraesophageal primary cancer and upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer associated with esophageal cancer are common diseases, especially in heavy drinkers. They are often explained by the concept of field cancerization, which suggests a similar etiology. However, little is known about the nature of the hypothesized etiology. METHODS: Among 901 Japanese male alcoholics systematically screened by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (with esophageal iodine staining), 33 had squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The multiplicity of their esophageal carcinoma and their concurrent UADT cancer was compared with their genotype for aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2), the major determinant of blood acetaldehyde concentration after drinking. RESULTS: Of 17 patients with inactive ALDH2, 13 (76.5%) had multiple primary carcinoma of the esophagus, whereas 5 of 16 (31.3%) with active ALDH2 had multiple carcinomas (P < 0.01). The prevalence of concurrent UADT cancer was 29.4% in those patients with inactive ALDH2, compared with 6.3% in those patients with active ALDH2. CONCLUSIONS: Inactive ALDH2 is a risk factor for multiple carcinoma of the esophagus in alcoholics. Acetaldehyde, a recognized animal carcinogen, appears to play a critical role in field cancerization.

Alcoholism