PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2017330

Technical procedures and software for magnification-corrected morphometry of optic disk photography.

L Brigatti·F Bottoni·S Miglior·N Orzalesi
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In order to obtain a new diagnostic tool for the early diagnosis of glaucoma, we developed a method based on computerized analysis of the optic disk, cup and neuroretinal rim areas. A fundus camera, a personal computer and a graphic tablet are employed. Suitable software was developed for calculating the areas (disk, cup and rim) providing an index, the rim/disk ratio. The method revealed high repeatability and reproducibility. The simplicity and speed of the procedure make this test suitable for routine clinical use in the early diagnosis of glaucoma.

Explore related subjects

GlaucomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptic DiskPhotographySoftwareVision TestsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Brigatti, F Bottoni, S Miglior, N Orzalesi. 1991. Technical procedures and software for magnification-corrected morphometry of optic disk photography.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000310166

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗