PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2049505

Estimating standardized risk differences from odds ratios.

S Greenland·P Holland
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Holland (1989, Biometrics 45, 1009-1016) gave simple formulas for an "adjusted" risk difference based on the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio estimator and its variance. This "adjusted" risk difference is, in general, inconsistent, but Holland's variance formula is an immediate corollary of a more general formula by Greenland (1987, Journal of Chronic Diseases 40, 1087-1094). We show how, under a large-stratum limiting model, one can derive consistent estimators of standardized risk differences from any consistent odds ratio estimator. We also show how one can derive nonparametric standardized estimators under a sparse-data limiting model.

Explore related subjects

BiometryHumansModels, StatisticalOdds RatioJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Greenland, P Holland. 1991. Estimating standardized risk differences from odds ratios.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2049505/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry↗