PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2049515

On dependent repeated screening tests.

T S Lau
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A screening test is applied n times to a person with known true status. If more than k tests have positive outcomes, then the person is assigned to be screen-positive; otherwise, the person is assigned to be screen-negative. Assuming that the tests are exchangeable, we can characterize the possible dependence among tests by at most n parameters called canonical moments, which can be estimated from the data. The performance characteristics of the composite test (such as likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity) can be computed based on these estimates. Thus, we can choose n and k so that the desired levels of likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity can be achieved. We study the cases n = 2 and n = 3 in detail.

Explore related subjects

BiometryDiagnosisHumansModels, StatisticalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T S Lau. 1991. On dependent repeated screening tests.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2049515/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry↗