PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2215824

[Plax more effective than water?].

M J Schaeken·J S van der Hoeven
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Ten persons participated in a cross-over study in which the effect of rinsing with Plax and subsequent toothbrushing was compared with water rinsing and subsequent toothbrushing. Plaque was evaluated at baseline and after rinsing and toothbrushing. Bacterial and epithelial cells were counted in the material that was removed by rinsing and brushing. In addition the dry-weight of this material was determined. The differences between Plax and water in plaque reduction, the number of bacterial and epithelial cells in the material removed from the mouth were statistically not significant. The weight of the material removed by the rinsing and brushing was higher after rinsing with Plax. This was caused by the more vigorous removal of epithelial cells by Plax than by water.

Explore related subjects

Dental PlaqueHumansMouthwashesOral HygieneClinical TrialComparative StudyControlled Clinical TrialEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Schaeken, J S van der Hoeven. 1990. [Plax more effective than water?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2215824/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Meta-analyses of studies of 0.2% delmopinol mouth rinse as an adjunct to gingival health and plaque control measures.

BACKGROUND: Delmopinol is a third-generation anti-plaque agent used as a mouthwash to reduce plaque and alleviate gingivitis. OBJECTIVE: To create an overview of the anti-plaque efficacy of 0.2% delmopinol as an adjunct to normal oral hygiene measures by meta-analysis of completed clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight double-blind, parallel-group studies were identified. Study durations ranged from 8 to 24 weeks. Five studies (n=913) involved supervised rinsing; three studies (n=467) involved unsupervised rinsing. These sets of trials were analysed separately and in combination. Efficacy outcomes comprised modified plaque index, modified gingival index (MGI) and gingival bleeding on probing (BOP). RESULTS: Delmopinol 0.2% was superior to placebo for the reduction of plaque scores in both sets of studies. Effects on MGI and BOP were also better with delmopinol 0.2% than with placebo. In most instances, 95% confidence intervals were wholly in favour of delmopinol. Pooled analysis of all eight studies confirmed statistically significant effects of delmopinol 0.2% compared with placebo (p<0.00001). Delmopinol met the efficacy criteria of the American Dental Association in studies of extended duration. CONCLUSION: Delmopinol 0.2% mouthwash is effective as an adjunct measure for reducing plaque burden and indices of gingivitis, whether or not it is used under supervision.

Dental Plaque↗
PubMed2006

A review of the effects of stannous fluoride on gingivitis.

AIM: To review the literature on the effects of stannous fluoride on gingivitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Medline and cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched up to August 2005 to identify appropriate studies. The primary outcome measure was gingivitis. RESULTS: Independent screening of titles and abstracts of 542 papers resulted in 36 publications (inter-reviewer ê score of 0.76), out of which 15 papers finally fulfilled the criteria of eligibility. For SnF(2)dentifrices, a statistically significant reduction in gingivitis was noted in comparison with control (weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.15 (gingival index) and 0.21 (gingivitis severity index) (test for heterogeneity p<0.00001, I(2)=91.1% and p=0.03, I(2)=80.1%, respectively)). With regard to plaque reduction inconsistent results existed. On using the plaque index no differences were found, whereas meta-analysis of the Turesky index provided a WMD of 0.31 (p=0.01, test for heterogeneity p<0.0001, I(2)=91.7%). Because of insufficient data, a meta-analysis for SnF(2)mouth rinse and dentifrice/mouthrinse formulations was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SnF(2) dentifrices results in gingivitis and plaque reduction when compared with a conventional dentifrice. The precise magnitude of this effect was difficult to assess because of a high level of heterogeneity in study outcomes.

Dental Plaque↗