PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2283448

Assessing assertive behaviour in student nurses: a comparison of assertion measures.

Abstract

This study compared four different assertive measurements used to assess student-nurse behaviour. The measurements employed included a semantic differential 'subjective self-report', the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule, a behavioural test, and observer ratings. The study was divided into three different phases. In phase one, subjects (n = 19) were requested to complete the two self-report measures. Several days later, they were asked to partake in a behavioural test which took the form of a response to an unreasonable request. The final phase entailed observers (n = 9) viewing a video-recording of the behavioural test (without sound) and rating subjects on levels of assertiveness. Analyses of the results revealed only one significant finding, namely that there was a positive relationship between the scores on the Semantic Differential Measurement and the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule (P less than 0.05). No other significant results emerged. The findings of this investigation are discussed in the context of the role of assertive behaviour in nursing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J McCartan, O D Hargie. 1990. Assessing assertive behaviour in student nurses: a comparison of assertion measures.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01778.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Making communication research matter: what do patients notice, what do patients want, and what do patients need?

OBJECTIVE: To explore limitations of current communication theory by considering different perspectives of researchers, clinicians, patients and teachers of communication. METHOD: Theory development based on limitations of the current communication research literature due to inconsistencies between patient reports and observed communication behavior. RESULTS: While researchers focus on the mechanics and techniques of communication, patients seek relationships in which they experience trust, the right amount of autonomy, caring, and expertise. Patients', physicians', and communication experts' perspectives do not always define the same problems and often point to different solutions. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to studying clinician behaviors and patient perceptions of care, communication research should focus on five additional factors: what patients notice, want and need, and how their perspectives differ from those of physicians and researchers; the context, including illness severity and type and family influences; how complex health systems facilitate and impede communication; patients' influences on physician communication behavior; and habits of mind that promote attentive care.

Assertiveness↗

Using an executive coach to increase leadership effectiveness.

Senior executive nursing roles demand excellence and rigor in both the technical and interpersonal domains of leadership. Many nurse leaders have begun seeking innovative self-development programs and practices to assist them as they strive to improve their effectiveness as leaders in complex organizations. One practice that has gained in popularity is that of engaging a leadership "coach." To understand this relatively new trend in healthcare leadership, the authors interviewed 4 coaches and 4 nurse leaders who had been coached. In this article, they present their overall findings about the effectiveness of coaching as a leadership development tool and offer recommendations for leaders who are interested in engaging a coach.

Assertiveness↗