PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2285512

Asymmetric interlimb interference during the performance of a dynamic bimanual task.

Abstract

The control of a dynamic bimanual task was examined by manipulating two independent factors that potentially influence interlimb interference. Subjects attempted to perform a unidirectional movement with either their preferred or nonpreferred arm while concurrently producing a sequential movement with the contralateral arm. The magnitude of force required to produce the more complex, sequential action was manipulated in addition to the arm with which it was performed. The degree of interlimb interference was determined through an analysis of limb kinematics. A clear performance asymmetry was noted, with greater interference evident when the sequential action was generated by the nonpreferred left arm than by the preferred right arm. The level of force needed to produce the sequential movement also directly influenced interlimb interference, but this effect was bilaterally symmetrical. The findings are generally consistent with a hierarchical view of movement organization comprising lateralized hemispheric specialization for the organization of time-domain characteristics of sequential actions, followed by nonlateralized metrical scaling of force parameters. Implications of the findings for "dynamical" descriptions of bimanual actions are also discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C B Walter, S P Swinnen. 1990. Asymmetric interlimb interference during the performance of a dynamic bimanual task.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(90)90028-m

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗