PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 232014

[Bone maturity and physical performance].

Abstract

We have examined the relation between physical performance (as measured with the CAHPER tests), bone age (Greulich and Pyl's wrist evaluation) and dental age (Garn's method). Our study included 164 boys and 149 girls aged from 7 to 11. In spite of interesting significant simple correlation between most of the CAHPER tests and bone age measurements for the pre-pubescent period, the latter remains of negligible value in predicting physical performance in the studied children when variables like chronological age, body height and body weight are already included in the prediction equation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M K Rajic, G R Brisson, R J Shephard, H Lavallée, J C Jéquier, R Massé, S Jéquier, T Lussier, R Labarre. 1979. [Bone maturity and physical performance].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/232014/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Long-term treatment with growth hormone of children with short stature and normal growth hormone secretion.

Children with short stature but normal growth rate and/or normal growth hormone response to sleep and secretagogues were treated with recombinant methionyl human growth hormone, 0.3 mg/kg per week. In each year of treatment, about 80% of the subjects maintained an increase in growth rate greater than the defined limit (greater than 1 cm/yr above pretreatment growth rate) for continuation of human growth hormone treatment. Comparison of the group that continued to respond to human growth hormone with the group that did not maintain an accelerated growth rate did not reveal differences in bone age delay, sleep or secretagogue-stimulated human growth hormone secretion, degree of short stature either absolute or relative to target height, and somatomedin C concentration before or after initiation of therapy. The group that failed to respond to the human growth hormone treatment in the first year of treatment was younger and had a higher pretreatment growth rate. Review of the longitudinal growth curves revealed five patterns of response to human growth hormone treatment: (1) failure to increase growth rate in two subjects with height SD scores within 1 SD of target height, (2) failure to increase growth rate in five subjects with height SD scores greater than 1 SD less than the target height, (3) acceleration in growth rate in three subjects that was not maintained until achievement of a height within 1 SD of the target height, (4) acceleration of growth rate in five subjects that was maintained until achievement of a height within 1 SD of the target height, and (5) acceleration in growth rate that was maintained during the 3 years of treatment in 15 subjects who had not attained a height within 1 SD of the target height. We conclude that human growth hormone treatment of some but not all short children with "normal" growth hormone secretion will result in sustained acceleration of growth rate and attainment of prepubertal heights that are closer to but do not exceed their genetic height potential. A clinical trial of human growth hormone may be necessary to determine which subjects will benefit from the treatment.

Age Determination by Skeleton

Height prognosis of children with true precocious puberty and growth hormone deficiency: effect of combination therapy with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone.

We evaluated height prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of long-term, combination therapy with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist and growth hormone (GH) in five children (three girls) with coexistent precocious puberty and GH deficiency. Their clinical characteristics and growth response were compared with those of 12 girls with idiopathic true precocious puberty and eight prepubertal GH-deficient children (one girl). Precocious GH-deficient subjects were older than the precocious GH-sufficient children (9.5 +/- 1.8 years vs 6.5 +/- 1.3 years; mean +/- SD), but bone ages were comparable (12 +/- 3.7 years vs 10 +/- 0.9 years); their chronologic age was similar to that of the prepubertal GH-deficient children (9.6 +/- 2.1 years), but bone age was significantly more advanced (6.9 +/- 2.3 years). The mean height velocity of the prepubertal GH-deficient children (3.8 +/- 1.5 cm/yr) was lower than that of the precocious GH-deficient subjects (6.7 +/- 1.6 cm/yr) and the precocious GH-sufficient children (9.5 +/- 2.9 cm/yr). Baseline adult height prediction z scores were significantly lower in the precocious GH-deficient children (-3.7 +/- 1.0) than in either the precocious GH-sufficient children (-2.2 +/- 1.0) or the prepubertal GH-deficient subjects (-1.5 +/- 0.8). During therapy with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist, growth rates slowed to an average of 3.7 cm/yr in the precocious GH-deficient children but increased after the addition of GH to 7.4 cm during the first year of combination therapy. After 2 to 3 years of combination therapy, height predictions increased an average of 10 cm, compared with an increase of 2.8 cm in the precocious GH-sufficient group treated with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist alone. We conclude that combination treatment with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist and GH improves the height prognosis of children with coexistent true precocious puberty and GH deficiency, but falls short of achieving normal adult height potential.

Age Determination by Skeleton

Predictors of growth response to growth hormone in otherwise normal short children.

Sixty prepubertal short children (39 boys) with heights less than 2 SD for age and gender were treated daily for 1 year with recombinant human growth hormone (GH), either 0.1 IU/kg (group 0.1, n = 32) or 0.05 IU/kg (group 0.05, n = 28). Reserve of GH was determined by at least one GH provocative stimulus and 24-hour continuous blood withdrawal to determine the integrated concentration of GH (IC-GH). All participants had a GH response to provocative tests greater than 10 micrograms/L. The height velocity (mean +/- SD) of the group as a whole increased from 4.46 +/- 1.02 to 7.59 +/- 1.65 cm/yr (p less than 0.001). The growth velocity of group 0.1 was significantly greater than that of group 0.05 (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 7.0 +/- 1.65 cm/yr; p less than 0.01). Bone age did not advance more than 1 year during the treatment period. Growth velocity after 1 year of GH therapy was inversely correlated with the IC-GH in both groups, as was the pretreatment height velocity. We found no correlation of growth velocity during GH therapy with other measures such as parental heights, bone age/chronologic age ratio, maximal GH response to provocative tests, chronologic age, or pretreatment insulin-like growth factor I levels. We conclude that the best predictors for the 1-year growth outcome of short children with a normal GH response to provocative tests are the pretreatment growth velocity and the IC-GH. The short-term benefit from GH therapy in children with a normal growth velocity and a normal IC-GH is poor, whereas marked growth acceleration is noted in children with a low growth velocity and a low 24-hour IC-GH.

Age Determination by Skeleton