PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2322429

Safety considerations in product development.

Abstract

In drug development, about 1 in 1000 interesting compounds reaches the market. Drug safety is only relative and needs to be considered in the context of efficacy. Ultimately, the standards of safety and efficacy are determined by society. Drug safety can be enhanced by adequate patient education, i.e. patients should understand their disease as well as the risks and benefits of their medication. There is often considerable public pressure on the Government and regulatory authorities to alter some aspects of the drug development process. While we should not engage in poor science or alter regulations unthinkingly, the process should be re-examined and re-evaluated as the usual methods of evaluating risk/benefit may not be suitable for a particular disease or patient population. Public pressure has influenced changes in the USA, such as the parallel track testing, early release of drugs etc. It is important to realise that absolute toxicity is rare. Relative toxicity is more usual but may be influenced by many factors such as disease processes, drug dose, duration of administration, kinetic parameters or immunological factors. Clinical considerations in the drug development process include the predictability of adverse reactions in some patient populations, problems of over-dosage, unexpected drug-drug interactions and availability of patient monitoring. Economic factors such as total cost of the drug regimen, availability of alternative therapies, expense of sponsor-initiated special studies and surveillance, liability risk and the potential cost of altered labelling, warning notices and even market withdrawal are also considered. Thus, there are general guidelines, but the clinical, safety and toxicity considerations involved in the development of each drug may be special or unique.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A H Hayes. 1990. Safety considerations in product development.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199000051-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strategies to design pyrazolyl urea derivatives for p38 kinase inhibition: a molecular modeling study.

The p38 protein kinase is a serine-threonine mitogen activated protein kinase, which plays an important role in inflammation and arthritis. A combined study of 3D-QSAR and molecular docking has been undertaken to explore the structural insights of pyrazolyl urea p38 kinase inhibitors. The 3D-QSAR studies involved comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices (CoMSIA). The best CoMFA model was derived from the atom fit alignment with a cross-validated r (2 )(q (2)) value of 0.516 and conventional r (2) of 0.950, while the best CoMSIA model yielded a q (2) of 0.455 and r (2) of 0.979 (39 molecules in training set, 9 molecules in test set). The CoMFA and CoMSIA contour maps generated from these models provided inklings about the influence of interactive molecular fields in the space on the activity. GOLD, Sybyl (FlexX) and AutoDock docking protocols were exercised to explore the protein-inhibitor interactions. The integration of 3D-QSAR and molecular docking has proffered essential structural features of pyrazolyl urea inhibitors and also strategies to design new potent analogues with enhanced activity.

Drug Design↗