PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2385661

Maxillofacial fractures in the elderly: a comparative study.

Abstract

Previous maxillofacial trauma research has dealt primarily with facial bone fractures in the general population. Very few studies have specifically addressed maxillofacial fractures in the elderly. We compared 45 elderly (65 years of age or older) and 201 younger adult (16 to 64 years of age) patients admitted to our hospital with maxillofacial fractures. The percentage of patients admitted with nasal bone fractures was much greater in the elderly population, while mandibular fractures were more common in the adult group. Motor vehicle accidents accounted for over half the injuries in both groups, while falls were more prevalent in the elderly. Management of the elderly patient may be complicated by their associated injuries or underlying medical problems, perhaps partially accounting for their longer median length of hospital stay. The elderly are a unique subpopulation of maxillofacial fracture patients and deserve further study regarding their injuries and optimal methods for treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Falcone, G J Haedicke, G Brooks, P K Sullivan. 1990. Maxillofacial fractures in the elderly: a comparative study.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199009000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Escitalopram in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients.

AIM: The primary aim was to investigate the long-term safety and tolerability of escitalopram (10 or 20 mg/day) treatment of elderly patients suffering from major depressive disorder. The secondary aim was to examine response to treatment, as measured by change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from study entry to each visit, using observed cases. METHOD: This extension trial included 225 patients who had completed an 8-week, double blind, placebo-controlled lead-in study, which was performed in outpatients in primary care and in specialist clinics. The intent-to-treat population comprised 223 patients. RESULTS: The overall withdrawal rate was 24%. The most common reason for withdrawal was adverse events (9%). The 5 most common adverse events were accidental injury, rhinitis, weight increase, arthralgia and coughing, with an incidence ranging from 8 to 13%. No new types of adverse events were reported in this extension study compared to the 8-week lead-in study. The mean weight increased from 69.7 kg at study entry to 70.3 kg at endpoint. The percentage of patients in remission (MADRS total score < or = 12) increased from 48% at study entry to 72% by week 52. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram demonstrated a favourable tolerability profile during 52 weeks of open-label treatment of elderly patients, with further improvement in depressive symptoms.

Accidental Falls↗

MRI of rupture of the spring ligament complex with talo-cuboid impaction.

The spring ligament complex is essential for the stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot and includes the ligaments between the calcaneus and the talus at the superomedial to inferoplantar aspect of the foot. Tears of the spring ligament complex are most commonly degenerative in etiology and secondary to concomitant abnormality of the posterior tibial tendon. We report MRI findings in a 30-year-old man who presented with traumatic rupture of the spring ligament complex, seen following dislocation of the talonavicular joint. We also describe the previously unreported MRI features of talo-cuboid impaction secondary to disruption of the spring ligament complex.

Accidental Falls↗