PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2409549

Liver transplant program: nursing administration issues (continuing education).

M D Elliott·R T Gogain·R M Kelleher·A C McDermott
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

BostonContinuity of Patient CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsLiver TransplantationOperating Room NursingOperating RoomsPerioperative NursingRecovery RoomJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M D Elliott, R T Gogain, R M Kelleher, A C McDermott. 1985. Liver transplant program: nursing administration issues (continuing education).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2409549/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Multivariate scan statistics for disease surveillance.

In disease surveillance, there are often many different data sets or data groupings for which we wish to do surveillance. If each data set is analysed separately rather than combined, the statistical power to detect an outbreak that is present in all data sets may suffer due to low numbers in each. On the other hand, if the data sets are added by taking the sum of the counts, then a signal that is primarily present in one data set may be hidden due to random noise in the other data sets. In this paper, we present an extension of the spatial and space-time scan statistic that simultaneously incorporates multiple data sets into a single likelihood function, so that a signal is generated whether it occurs in only one or in multiple data sets. This is done by defining the combined log likelihood as the sum of the individual log likelihoods for those data sets for which the observed case count is more than the expected. We also present another extension, where the concept of combining likelihoods from different data sets is used to adjust for covariates. Using data from the National Bioterrorism Syndromic Surveillance Demonstration Project, we illustrate the new method using physician telephone calls, regular physician visits and urgent care visits by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care members cared for by Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, a large multi-specialty group practice in Massachusetts. For upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) illness, there were on average 20 telephone calls, nine urgent care visits and 22 regular physician visits per day. The strongest signal was generated by a single data set and due to a familial outbreak of pinworm disease. The second and third strongest signals were generated by the combined strength of two of the three data sets.

Boston↗
PubMed2007

Visual screening for malignant melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various melanoma screening strategies proposed in the United States. DESIGN: We developed a computer simulation Markov model to evaluate alternative melanoma screening strategies. PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical cohort of the general population and siblings of patients with melanoma. Intervention We considered the following 4 strategies: background screening only, and screening 1 time, every 2 years, and annually, all beginning at age 50 years. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality data were taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Sibling risk, recurrence rates, and treatment costs were taken from the literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime costs. Cost-effectiveness ratios were in dollars per quality-adjusted life year (US dollars/QALY) gained. RESULTS: In the general population, screening 1 time, every 2 years, and annually saved 1.6, 4.4, and 5.2 QALYs per 1000 persons screened, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US dollars 10,100/QALY, US dollars 80,700/QALY, and US dollars 586,800/QALY, respectively. In siblings of patients with melanoma (relative risk, 2.24 compared with the general population), 1-time, every-2-years, and annual screenings saved 3.6, 9.8, and 11.4 QALYs per 1000 persons screened, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US dollars 4000/QALY, US dollars 35,500/QALY, and US dollars 257,800/QALY, respectively. In higher risk siblings of patients with melanoma (relative risk, 5.56), screening was more cost-effective. Results were most sensitive to screening cost, melanoma progression rate, and specificity of visual screening. CONCLUSIONS: One-time melanoma screening of the general population older than 50 years is very cost-effective compared with other cancer screening programs in the United States. Screening every 2 years in siblings of patients with melanoma is also cost-effective.

Boston↗
PubMed2007

Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Medical knowledge learned by trainees is often quickly forgotten. How can the educational process be tailored to shift learning into longer-term memory? We investigated whether 'spaced education', consisting of weekly e-mailed case scenarios and clinical questions, could improve the retention of students' learning. METHODS: During the 2004-5 surgery clerkships, 3rd-year students completed a mandatory 1-week clinical rotation in urology and validated web-based teaching programme on 4 core urology topics. Spaced educational e-mails were constructed on all 4 topics based on a validated urology curriculum. Each consisted of a short clinically relevant question or clinical case scenario in multiple-choice question format, followed by the answer, teaching point summary and explanations of the answers. Students were randomised to receive weekly e-mailed case scenarios in only 2 of the 4 urology topics upon completion of their urology rotation. Students completed a validated 28-item test (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76) on all 4 topics prior to and after the rotation and at the end of the academic year. RESULTS: A total of 95 of 133 students (71%) completed the end-of-year test. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between randomised cohorts. Spaced education significantly improved composite end-of-year test scores (P < 0.001, paired t-test). The impact of the spaced educational e-mails was largest for those students who completed their urology education 6-8 and 9-11 months previously (Cohen's effect sizes of 1.01 and 0.73, respectively). CONCLUSION: Spaced education consisting of clinical scenarios and questions distributed weekly via e-mail can significantly improve students' retention of medical knowledge.

Boston↗