Automatic implantable defibrillator discharge resulting from routine pacemaker programming.

C Gottlieb; J M Miller; M E Rosenthal; F E Marchlinski

doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05013.x

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2452422

Automatic implantable defibrillator discharge resulting from routine pacemaker programming.

C Gottlieb·J M Miller·M E Rosenthal·F E Marchlinski

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A middle-aged gentleman with an idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, drug-refractory sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and high-degree AV block was managed with an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) and a Cordis Multicor II VVI pacemaker. During a routine follow-up visit, the pacemaker threshold was determined. Seven seconds after reprogramming the Cordis pacemaker to the "stat" VVI mode, the AICD discharged. The time to discharge after reprogramming the pacemaker equalled the previously determined AICD charge time. No other rhythm disturbance was documented and the rate with double counting of pacemaker stimulus and QRS complex was less than the triggering rate for the AICD. In conclusion, the AICD can be triggered by pacemaker programming signals unrelated to subsequent pacemaker function.

Explore related subjects

Electric Countershock Electrocardiography Electromagnetic Phenomena Equipment Failure Humans Male Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial Prostheses and Implants Case Reports Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C Gottlieb, J M Miller, M E Rosenthal, F E Marchlinski. 1988. Automatic implantable defibrillator discharge resulting from routine pacemaker programming.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05013.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Risks of electric cardioversion of tachyarrhythmia in patients with pacemakers].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Electric Countershock↗

PubMed1992

Use of telemetry functions in the assessment of implanted antitachycardia device efficacy.

Twenty patients (aged 50 +/- 21 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 37 +/- 17%) with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias were treated with an investigational, implantable combined antitachycardia-pacing cardioverter defibrillator. The device's telemetry capabilities include both stored (1-second snapshots) and real-time display of endocardial and device-circuit signals. The device can store these before, during and after up to 50 tachycardia and antitachycardia pacing episodes. All stored events are indexed to a 24-hour internal clock. During 10.1 +/- 5.1 months of follow-up, the device was used in 11 of 20 patients. In the entire group, antitachycardia pacing was activated on 44 +/- 14 occasions per patient (total 874) and shock delivery occurred on 8 +/- 14 occasions per patient (total 156). Reconstruction by stored telemetry of all device-therapy episodes was possible. Twenty-six percent of all shocks delivered were not appropriate and were due to atrial arrhythmias in 2 patients and dysfunction of the sensing lead in 3. The absence of a relation between symptoms and appropriate shock delivery was documented in 1 patient. Antitachycardia pace acceleration occurred in 5.3% of cases; 7% of attempts at pacing were unsuccessful and needed shock therapy. It is concluded that the enhanced telemetry available in newer antitachycardia devices enables more accurate assessment of device use and enhances diagnosis of inappropriate therapy delivery.

Electric Countershock↗

PubMed1992

Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads.

Bidirectional shocks using 2 current pathways have been used in endocardial lead systems for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, but the optimal shock waveform for endocardial defibrillation is unknown. The clinical efficacy and electrical characteristics of bidirectional monophasic and biphasic shocks for endocardial cardioversion-defibrillation of fast monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were evaluated. Thirty-three patients (mean age 60 +/- 12 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 34 +/- 13%) were studied. Defibrillation catheter electrodes were located in the right ventricular apex and superior vena cava/right atrial junction. A triple-electrode configuration including the 2 catheter electrodes and a left thoracic patch was used to deliver bidirectional shocks from the right ventricular cathode to an atrial anode (pathway 1) and the thoracic patch (pathway 2). The shock waveforms examined were sequential and simultaneous monophasic, and simultaneous biphasic. The efficacy of 580 V (20 J) shocks for fast monomorphic VT were comparable for the 3 waveforms (73% for sequential monophasic, 73% for simultaneous monophasic, and 100% for simultaneous biphasic). However, for polymorphic VT and VF, 580 V sequential monophasic shocks had a significantly lower efficacy (25%) than did simultaneous monophasic (75%; p = 0.01) or biphasic (89%; p less than 0.001) shocks. Single-shock defibrillation thresholds with simultaneous biphasic shocks were significantly lower (9 +/- 5 J) than were those with simultaneous monophasic shocks (15 +/- 4 J; p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electric Countershock↗