PubMed · 2637154
Risk modelling: which models to choose?
Abstract
Using as examples excess lung cancer mortality in coke oven workers and lung tumor induction in rats by inhalation of diesel engine emissions or cadmium chloride aerosol, the maximum likelihood estimate and the upper limit of risk were determined using a set of conventional risk models. The additional safety offered by going to the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval when deriving a unit risk value was found to be less than a factor of 5 in all but one case, and usually much less than 2. It is concluded that the selection of an adequate model is the most critical step in risk assessment, and that an additional safety factor may be required to allow for a better protection of the public in case models other than the most conservative ones come into use.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M J Csicsaky, M Roller, F Pott. 1989. Risk modelling: which models to choose?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0232-1513(89)80049-0
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.