PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2704778

[Ethics in psychotherapy].

Abstract

After introducing the terms "morality" and "ethics" as defined by Patzig, the discussion focuses on applying to the practicing of psychotherapy the guidelines for ethics in medicine formulated by Beauchamp and Childress, i.e. respect of the autonomy of the patient, the doctor's duty to prevent injury, the obligation to give assistance and the principle of fairness. In particular, it is pointed out that to hale respect for the autonomy of the patient, a thorough and patient inquiry concerning diagnosis, indication and therapy is necessary in order for the patient to develop intrinsic motivation based on insight into his condition and evaluation of the prognosis. In connection with the discussion of the nil nocere, reference is made to the therapist's duty to take a patient's various limits of tolerance into account. Emphasis is also placed on the psychotherapist's duty to "service" his own psychic apparatus with the help of continued education and in-service training, supervision and self-analysis. Applied to psychotherapy, the obligation to give assistance means encouraging the patient to go in the direction of greater autonomy which means the reduction of helplessness. In psychotherapy, problems of distributing resources fairly may be manifested in unjustifiably long waiting lists or in the form of patient selection carried out in a way that is not justifiable on medical grounds but based rather on a tendency to eliminate certain groups of disorders by using contra-indications that are basically rationalizations of countertransference reactions and which are not in keeping with the professional and personal identity of therapists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Heigl-Evers, F S Heigl. 1989. [Ethics in psychotherapy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2704778/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗