PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2760676

Patient classification system evaluation: Part 2, System selection and implementation.

Abstract

How can nurse executives assure optimum patient classification system performance? This two-part series advances a framework for patient classification system (PCS) evaluation. Using an expanded definition of a PCS, Part One (JONA, June) presented a discussion of the six system elements considered essential to a fully operational PCS. Part Two offers a description of PCS selection criteria as well as keys to successful system implementation. Application of this evaluation framework allows for rapid problem identification and remediation, assists with PCS selection and enhances overall system performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H A De Groot. Patient classification system evaluation: Part 2, System selection and implementation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2760676/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) with use of Rösch-Uchida transjugular liver access set--evaluation by CT and its clinical application].

Appropriateness of the Rösch-Uchida transjugular liver access set designed for TIPSS procedure was confirmed, especially about the catheter angle and effective length of the 20 G puncture needle, by CT analysis on three dimensional vascular anatomy of the liver. Clinically, TIPSS using the set was successfully made for two patients, connecting superior right hepatic vein with right portal vein in one patient and middle hepatic vein with left portal vein in another patient with hypoplastic right portal vein. Prior to TIPSS procedure, verification of vascular anatomy on CT images is the key to success of TIPSS in safe.

Evaluation Studies as Topic

[Testing an ultrasonic scanner for determination of urinary bladder volume].

Bladderscan BVI 2000 is a portable ultrasound scanner, specially constructed for determination of bladder volume. We have tested this scanner for accuracy, systematic errors and the training required to use it. The bladder volumes measured by ultrasound scanning were compared with the true volumes. Fifty-six measurements were made. We found the accuracy of BVI 2000 sufficient to determine bladder volumes as either small or large. We found no systematic errors. No special training is required to use the scanner. The device is thus useful in most clinical situations when greater accuracy than indicated here is not necessary.

Evaluation Studies as Topic