Skip to content

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2770813

How good is peer review?

A S Relman·M Angell

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Ethics, Professional Peer Review Comment Editorial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

A S Relman, M Angell. 1989-09-21. How good is peer review?. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198909213211211

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Ethics first.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethics, Professional↗

PubMed2006

ASCO core values: essential to progress in innovative, quality cancer care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethics, Professional↗

PubMed2006

Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.

Science is a powerful force for change in modern society. As the professionals at its helm, scientists have a unique responsibility to shepherd that change with thoughtful advocacy of their research and careful ethical scrutiny of their own behavior.

Ethics, Professional↗