PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2778639

Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors.

Abstract

Three determinants of the factor structures of personality traits are investigated. The 1st, selection of variables, was controlled by using 57 bipolar scales, selected to be representative of common trait terms. In analyses of 7 data sets, variants of the "Big Five" factors were always found. Factor similarities were very strong for the 3 largest factors, which were transformed into general evaluation and 2 descriptive dimensions. As a 2nd determinant, judgments about real people were compared with judgments about the conceptual relations among traits. Factor structures based on the 2 types of judgments are similar, but those based on conceptual judgments tend to be simpler. The 3rd determinant involved the degree of restriction of the sample to evaluatively homogeneous targets. Restriction of range reduced the size of all factors, especially Factor II. Findings from previous studies are integrated within this framework.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Peabody, L R Goldberg. 1989. Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0022-3514.57.3.552

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Making communication research matter: what do patients notice, what do patients want, and what do patients need?

OBJECTIVE: To explore limitations of current communication theory by considering different perspectives of researchers, clinicians, patients and teachers of communication. METHOD: Theory development based on limitations of the current communication research literature due to inconsistencies between patient reports and observed communication behavior. RESULTS: While researchers focus on the mechanics and techniques of communication, patients seek relationships in which they experience trust, the right amount of autonomy, caring, and expertise. Patients', physicians', and communication experts' perspectives do not always define the same problems and often point to different solutions. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to studying clinician behaviors and patient perceptions of care, communication research should focus on five additional factors: what patients notice, want and need, and how their perspectives differ from those of physicians and researchers; the context, including illness severity and type and family influences; how complex health systems facilitate and impede communication; patients' influences on physician communication behavior; and habits of mind that promote attentive care.

Assertiveness↗

Using an executive coach to increase leadership effectiveness.

Senior executive nursing roles demand excellence and rigor in both the technical and interpersonal domains of leadership. Many nurse leaders have begun seeking innovative self-development programs and practices to assist them as they strive to improve their effectiveness as leaders in complex organizations. One practice that has gained in popularity is that of engaging a leadership "coach." To understand this relatively new trend in healthcare leadership, the authors interviewed 4 coaches and 4 nurse leaders who had been coached. In this article, they present their overall findings about the effectiveness of coaching as a leadership development tool and offer recommendations for leaders who are interested in engaging a coach.

Assertiveness↗