PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2808043

Electron arc therapy: design, implementation and evaluation of a dynamic multi-vane collimator system.

Abstract

Innovative techniques in motion control technology have been applied to the design and implementation of a portable computer-controlled multi-vane collimator for use in electron arc therapy. The collimator, consisting of 18 independently controlled vanes, is inserted into the standard accessory mount assembly of a linear accelerator, in the same fashion as standard field shaping blocks. Power is supplied to the collimator vane motors via a self-contained battery system. The range of motion of the vanes, symmetrically mounted nine on each side, provides a variable aperture width projected to isocenter of 2 cm minimum to 8 cm maximum. The projected length of the aperture at isocenter is 38 cm. The transition time between vane positions is less than 1 second, corresponding to gantry movement of less than 1 degree. The movement of each of the 18 vanes is monitored and controlled by six individually addressed three axis processors that are shielded from the electron beam. A table of collimator vane positions versus gantry angle, as determined by dose optimization calculations, is stored in a data file. The desired collimator vane position corresponding to the current arc segment is conveyed from the control console to each vane controller via packets within a token passing network. Communication between the computer in the console area and the vane controllers is accomplished through encoded infra-red pulse transmission, eliminating the need for additional communication lines between the console and the accelerator. This dynamic collimator offers improved dose uniformity while simplifying the delivery of electron arc therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D D Leavitt, J R Stewart, J H Moeller, W L Lee, G A Takach. 1989. Electron arc therapy: design, implementation and evaluation of a dynamic multi-vane collimator system.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(89)90161-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Daily organ tracking in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer using an electronic portal imaging device with a dose saving acquisition mode.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily use of conventional electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) for organ tracking is limited due to the relatively high dose required for high quality image acquisition. We studied the use of a novel dose saving acquisition mode (RadMode) allowing to take images with one monitor unit per image in prostate cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and tracking of implanted fiducial gold markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty five patients underwent implantation of three fiducial gold markers prior to the planning CT. Before each treatment of a course of 37 fractions, orthogonal localization images from the antero-posterior and from the lateral direction were acquired. Portal images of both the setup procedure and the five IMRT treatment beams were analyzed. RESULTS: On average, four localization images were needed for a correct patient setup, resulting in four monitor units extra dose per fraction. The mean extra dose delivered to the patient was thereby increased by 1.2%. The procedure was precise enough to reduce the mean displacements prior to treatment to < o =0.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a new dose saving acquisition mode enables to perform daily EPID-based prostate tracking with a cumulative extra dose of below 1 Gy. This concept is efficiently used in IMRT-treated patients, where separation of setup beams from treatment beams is mandatory.

Electronics, Medical↗

Insert earphones--a comparison of short-duration signals measured with an occluded ear simulator and a 2cc coupler.

The responses of several insert earphones in the Etymotic 3A series were measured with the occluded ear simulator (IEC 60711) and the 2cc coupler (IEC 60126). Acoustic clicks following a 100 us rectangular voltage pulse were compared. The peak-to-peak equivalent sound pressure levels in the ear simulator were found to be 9.2 dB greater than those in the 2cc coupler. The difference was independent of type of earphone among those tested. Similar comparisons were made for tone pips (brief tones or tone bursts) and continuous tones. For a given drive voltage, differences in earphone output were almost the same as the corresponding differences in published RETSPLs for the occluded ear simulator and 2cc coupler (ISO 389-2).

Electronics, Medical↗

A simple mounting model for consistent determination of the accuracy and repeatability of apex locators.

AIM: To develop a precise and simple mounting model (MM) for evaluating apex locators and to compare the repeatability of the MM with a conventional visual method (VM). METHODOLOGY: Electronic working length determination was performed in 32 maxillary central incisors using two methods: (i) the MM method and (ii) a conventional VM. The MM utilizes a micrometer to determine the distance travelled by the measuring file during working length determination. In the VM, the length of the measuring file (representing the working length) is determined visually using a caliper and a microscope at 6x magnification. Each measurement was repeated once. The repeatability of each method was evaluated by calculating the coefficient of repeatability. RESULTS: The coefficient of repeatability, which includes 95% of the differences between repeated measurements, was 0.04 mm for MM compared with 0.9 mm for VM. The measurement error of MM was significantly lower than VM (0.02 and 0.4 mm respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the means of absolute difference in repeated measurements: MM 0.01 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01; 0.02 mm) compared with VM 0.4 mm (95% CI: 0.3; 0.5 mm). CONCLUSION: The new MM had superior repeatability in comparison with the conventional method where visual interpretation is a source of inaccurate measurement.

Electronics, Medical↗