PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2867628

Ask your pharmacist?

Abstract

Retail pharmacists should recognize their inadequate knowledge of Ipecac instructions. When confronted with an acute poisoning, these patients should be referred to their physician or nearest regional poison control center (3). Providing improper instructions creates the risks of: Vomiting a substance with which emesis is contraindicated; Unnecessary emesis; and Use of ineffective and unsafe methods of inducing emesis. Only 2 (6.25%) pharmacists gave complete and accurate instructions for the use of Ipecac--with the exception of mentioning the contraindications to emesis. However, both pharmacists referred the caller to their regional poison control center.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Heard, A P Rauber. 1985. Ask your pharmacist?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2867628/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The diffusion process of patient education in Dutch community pharmacy: an exploration.

Patient education activities in pharmacies are receiving much attention. These activities are relatively new and implementation requires individual and organisational change in pharmacies. The aim of this study is to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of patient education in community pharmacies and to classify these barriers and facilitators into the diffusion stages of Rogers' 'Innovations in Organisations' model [Rogers, EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1995]. Six focus group interviews, three with pharmacists and three with pharmacy technicians (total n = 38) were carried out. The initiation phase has been dealt with by community pharmacies, whereas the implementation phase has not. The barriers and facilitators in the redefining/restructuring stage were mainly related to the organisation of patient education. In the clarifying and routinizing stages, barriers were related to repetition and knowledge transfer. The facilitators in these stages relate to performing and talking about patient education. Interventions for implementation of patient education should aim at these barriers and facilitating factors.

Community Pharmacy Services↗

A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention based in community pharmacies.

AIMS: To evaluate whether a structured community pharmacy-based smoking cessation programme (the PAS model) would give rise to a higher smoking cessation rate compared with ad hoc advice from pharmacists. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial comparing a structured intervention with usual care. SETTING: One hundred pharmacists working in community pharmacies in N. Ireland and 24 in London took part in the study and were each asked to enroll 12 smokers; 44% of pharmacists who were trained managed to recruit one or more smokers during the recruitment period of approximately 1 year. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 484 smokers were enrolled by the pharmacists and individually randomized into the PAS intervention group (N = 265) or the control group (N = 219). INTERVENTION: The PAS intervention involved a structured counselling programme, an information leaflet and a follow-up weekly for the first 4 weeks then monthly as needed. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure of this study was self-reported smoking cessation for 12 months with cotinine validation at the 12-month follow-up. FINDINGS: Of smokers in the PAS group, 14.3% (38) were abstinent up to 12 months compared with 2.7% (6) in the control group (p < 0.001 for the difference). CONCLUSION: The community pharmacy-based PAS smoking cessation service can be an effective method of helping people stop smoking when delivered by pharmacists willing to adopt this approach.

Community Pharmacy Services↗