Computerized perimetry: possibilities for individual adaptation and feedback.

Abstract

Computerized perimetry is often poorly accepted by the tested subjects, presumably because of sparse feedback and lack of adaptation to individual capacity. Several remedies are suggested, including visual response feedback, active correction of erroneous responses, various fixation prompts, and continuous adaptation to current reaction time. Intuitively intelligible result displays are also desirable. A novel format representing threshold level by symbol size may meet this need.