PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3095884

Denis Browne: surgeon.

Abstract

Denis Browne was the first surgeon in England to confine his practice entirely to children. The methods of treatment devised by him were new and often revolutionary and were frequently attacked and criticized, but they worked. He regarded his research into the aetiology of congenital deformities as his most important single scientific contribution. In 1931, he published his first article on talipes equinovarus. He further enlarged his theory of the mechanical origin of congenital deformities in a study published in 1936. The mechanical theory led him to search for treatment by use of selectively applied pressures and controlled movements. He did not like open corrections. When confronted by a surgical problem he would invariably start by studying the anatomy of the region involved. He was the first to describe the superficial inguinal pouch. His anatomical studies eventually enabled him to perfect the operation for inguinal hernia in infancy and childhood and formed the basis of his operation for cleft palate and of his work on the surgical anatomy of the tonsil. He was the first pediatric surgeon to routinely employ transverse abdominal incisions. He preferred immediate anastomosis to the temporary enterostomies. He introduced the end-to-back anastomosis. He helped rationalizing and perfecting the operative technique for pyloric stenosis. Malformations of the perineum were the subject of many studies. His operation for hypospadias is also well known. His other advances in paediatric surgery, such as treatment of various infective conditions and cardiovascular surgery, were at the time original and important. His inventive genius was best seen in his development of numerous instruments and appliances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P P Rickham. 1986. Denis Browne: surgeon.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70825-1_8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy.

Both the UK's Labour Government and Scotland's devolved Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition Executive have committed themselves to reducing health inequalities. Furthermore, both institutions have emphasised the importance of using evidence to inform policy responses. In light of such political commitments, a significant amount of work has been undertaken in the field of health inequalities in order to: (i) review the available research evidence; (ii) assess the extent to which policies have been based on this research evidence; and (iii) evaluate the success (or failure) of policies to tackle health inequalities. Yet so far only limited attention has been given to exploring how key actors involved in research-policy dialogues understand the processes involved. In an attempt to address this gap, this article draws on data from semi-structured interviews with 58 key actors in the field of health inequalities research and policymaking in the UK to argue that it is ideas, rather than research evidence, which have travelled from research into policy. The descriptions of the varying journeys of these ideas fit three types--successful, partial and fractured--each of which is outlined with reference to one example. The paper then employs existing theories about research-policy relations and the movement of ideas in an attempt to illuminate and better understand the contrasting journeys. In the concluding discussion, it is argued that the third approach, which focuses on the entrepreneurial processes involved in the marketing of ideas, is most helpful in understanding the research findings, but that this needs to be discussed in relation to the political context within which negotiations take place.

England↗