PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3138667

Nursing case management. Resolving the DRG paradox.

Abstract

Nursing Case Management as described here was developed in less than ideal conditions: a full census, a 30 per cent increase in patient volume over five years, a nursing shortage, no grants or outside funding, no clinical specialists or clinical ladder, and no computerized documentation system. No more staff or salary was added as we focused our attention on the new tools, roles, and structures necessary to achieve cost and quality outcomes. However, nursing case management has worked because of some very key elements: 1. A firm commitment to the belief that staff nurses must be accountable for the outcomes of the care that they have planned, given, managed, and continuously evaluated. 2. A combination of top-down organizational development strategies with excellent staff nurse involvement at each juncture. 3. Negotiation and collaboration with physicians and hospital administration at key turning points. This includes the relentless articulation of patient-centered care. 4. A willingness to learn and risk together as a whole department--across levels, across specialties. This includes a constant balance of moving from concrete examples and problems to reconceptualizing the issues. 5. Listening, responsiveness, humor, and acknowledging contributions of everyone. More than any other principal, the case manager must be a central caregiver to a patient to ensure cost/quality outcomes. Otherwise case management only adds to the cost of health care by adding another level of bureaucracy. Nurses have always managed the care of patients, but to stay effective and committed, they need to take increased authority in their patients' entire episode of care and develop formal collaborative practice groups. In other words: "Prospective payment has changed the health care product from a day of care (or a visit) to an entire case or episode of illness. More than just a new way of paying for care, it has changed our way of planning, managing, and thinking about health care." Looking at the future entails understanding our business, and then changing our practice patterns for the change in the times. Necessity will foster invention; Nursing Case Management provides a model and technology for innovation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Zander. 1988. Nursing case management. Resolving the DRG paradox.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3138667/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multivariate scan statistics for disease surveillance.

In disease surveillance, there are often many different data sets or data groupings for which we wish to do surveillance. If each data set is analysed separately rather than combined, the statistical power to detect an outbreak that is present in all data sets may suffer due to low numbers in each. On the other hand, if the data sets are added by taking the sum of the counts, then a signal that is primarily present in one data set may be hidden due to random noise in the other data sets. In this paper, we present an extension of the spatial and space-time scan statistic that simultaneously incorporates multiple data sets into a single likelihood function, so that a signal is generated whether it occurs in only one or in multiple data sets. This is done by defining the combined log likelihood as the sum of the individual log likelihoods for those data sets for which the observed case count is more than the expected. We also present another extension, where the concept of combining likelihoods from different data sets is used to adjust for covariates. Using data from the National Bioterrorism Syndromic Surveillance Demonstration Project, we illustrate the new method using physician telephone calls, regular physician visits and urgent care visits by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care members cared for by Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, a large multi-specialty group practice in Massachusetts. For upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) illness, there were on average 20 telephone calls, nine urgent care visits and 22 regular physician visits per day. The strongest signal was generated by a single data set and due to a familial outbreak of pinworm disease. The second and third strongest signals were generated by the combined strength of two of the three data sets.

Boston↗

Visual screening for malignant melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various melanoma screening strategies proposed in the United States. DESIGN: We developed a computer simulation Markov model to evaluate alternative melanoma screening strategies. PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical cohort of the general population and siblings of patients with melanoma. Intervention We considered the following 4 strategies: background screening only, and screening 1 time, every 2 years, and annually, all beginning at age 50 years. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality data were taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Sibling risk, recurrence rates, and treatment costs were taken from the literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime costs. Cost-effectiveness ratios were in dollars per quality-adjusted life year (US dollars/QALY) gained. RESULTS: In the general population, screening 1 time, every 2 years, and annually saved 1.6, 4.4, and 5.2 QALYs per 1000 persons screened, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US dollars 10,100/QALY, US dollars 80,700/QALY, and US dollars 586,800/QALY, respectively. In siblings of patients with melanoma (relative risk, 2.24 compared with the general population), 1-time, every-2-years, and annual screenings saved 3.6, 9.8, and 11.4 QALYs per 1000 persons screened, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US dollars 4000/QALY, US dollars 35,500/QALY, and US dollars 257,800/QALY, respectively. In higher risk siblings of patients with melanoma (relative risk, 5.56), screening was more cost-effective. Results were most sensitive to screening cost, melanoma progression rate, and specificity of visual screening. CONCLUSIONS: One-time melanoma screening of the general population older than 50 years is very cost-effective compared with other cancer screening programs in the United States. Screening every 2 years in siblings of patients with melanoma is also cost-effective.

Boston↗

Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Medical knowledge learned by trainees is often quickly forgotten. How can the educational process be tailored to shift learning into longer-term memory? We investigated whether 'spaced education', consisting of weekly e-mailed case scenarios and clinical questions, could improve the retention of students' learning. METHODS: During the 2004-5 surgery clerkships, 3rd-year students completed a mandatory 1-week clinical rotation in urology and validated web-based teaching programme on 4 core urology topics. Spaced educational e-mails were constructed on all 4 topics based on a validated urology curriculum. Each consisted of a short clinically relevant question or clinical case scenario in multiple-choice question format, followed by the answer, teaching point summary and explanations of the answers. Students were randomised to receive weekly e-mailed case scenarios in only 2 of the 4 urology topics upon completion of their urology rotation. Students completed a validated 28-item test (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76) on all 4 topics prior to and after the rotation and at the end of the academic year. RESULTS: A total of 95 of 133 students (71%) completed the end-of-year test. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between randomised cohorts. Spaced education significantly improved composite end-of-year test scores (P < 0.001, paired t-test). The impact of the spaced educational e-mails was largest for those students who completed their urology education 6-8 and 9-11 months previously (Cohen's effect sizes of 1.01 and 0.73, respectively). CONCLUSION: Spaced education consisting of clinical scenarios and questions distributed weekly via e-mail can significantly improve students' retention of medical knowledge.

Boston↗