PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3183263

Factors that influence learner readiness.

Abstract

Dietitians and nutrition educators can better decide what and how to teach if they first determine what the client or student is ready to learn. This article describes four major factors that influence learner readiness in short one-to-one interactions. The factors include information processing capacity, affective state, prior learning and experience, and the learner's "way of knowing" or philosophy of learning. Important aspects of the factors can be revealed quickly with 2 to 3 minutes of respectful, interested questioning to determine whether the learner is in a negative mood or oppressed affective state and to determine his or her experiential or knowledge background and approach or reaction to learning new material. The most common mistake educators make is "information overload." The human capacity to process information is limited. Instruction should be made to fit the learner's capacity (i.e., a maximum of seven +/- two concepts should be addressed in a 15-minute period). When nutritionists adjust their teaching style to better fit individual variations, they will maximize their impact as educators.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Achterberg. 1988. Factors that influence learner readiness.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3183263/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.

OBJECTIVES: To survey operating theatre and intensive care unit staff about attitudes concerning error, stress, and teamwork and to compare these attitudes with those of airline cockpit crew. DESIGN: : Cross sectional surveys. SETTING: : Urban teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the United States, Israel, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. Major airlines around the world. PARTICIPANTS: : 1033 doctors, nurses, fellows, and residents working in operating theatres and intensive care units and over 30 000 cockpit crew members (captains, first officers, and second officers). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Perceptions of error, stress, and teamwork. RESULTS: : Pilots were least likely to deny the effects of fatigue on performance (26% v 70% of consultant surgeons and 47% of consultant anaesthetists). Most pilots (97%) and intensive care staff (94%) rejected steep hierarchies (in which senior team members are not open to input from junior members), but only 55% of consultant surgeons rejected such hierarchies. High levels of teamwork with consultant surgeons were reported by 73% of surgical residents, 64% of consultant surgeons, 39% of anaesthesia consultants, 28% of surgical nurses, 25% of anaesthetic nurses, and 10% of anaesthetic residents. Only a third of staff reported that errors are handled appropriately at their hospital. A third of intensive care staff did not acknowledge that they make errors. Over half of intensive care staff reported that they find it difficult to discuss mistakes. CONCLUSIONS: Medical staff reported that error is important but difficult to discuss and not handled well in their hospital. Barriers to discussing error are more important since medical staff seem to deny the effect of stress and fatigue on performance. Further problems include differing perceptions of teamwork among team members and reluctance of senior theatre staff to accept input from junior members.

Attitude