PubMed · 3203987
A prospective study of titanium ventilation tubes.
Abstract
A prospective controlled study was undertaken in which in 100 children a titanium ventilation tube was inserted in one ear, and a Paparella silicone tube was inserted in the contralateral ear as a control. The tubes were evaluated with respect to length of time of intubation, episodes of otorrhea, and early occlusion. Sixty-five patients were followed for at least one year, or until both tubes had extruded. Long-term follow-up of these patients has revealed little difference in the incidence of tube occlusion, early extrusion, or infection with otorrhea. Since the titanium tube is more than twice as expensive and has no proven advantages over a silicone tube of similar design, we have no reason to recommend its use over the less costly, standard silicon ventilation tube.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S D Handler, L Miller, W P Potsic, R F Wetmore, R R Marsh. 1988. A prospective study of titanium ventilation tubes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5876(88)90100-0
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.