[Which pacemaker for which patient?].

J F Godin; H Le Marec

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3223721

[Which pacemaker for which patient?].

J F Godin·H Le Marec

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Since the early 1980's, in parallel to development of "physiological" cardiac stimulation, modalities and objectives for cardiac stimulation have been modified radically. Among the many methods of stimulation available, in practice the physician may choose from four main types: (1) single-chamber ventricular stimulation; (2) single-chamber atrial stimulation; (3) two-chamber stimulation; (4) variable rate stimulation. Three main elements determine choice of the method of stimulation: the patient's physical condition, his heart condition (nature and type of cardiopathy and hemodynamic profile) and of course, electrophysiological data and cardiac rhythm encountered. The object of this paper is to schematically describe this choice.

Explore related subjects

Arrhythmias, Cardiac Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Electrocardiography Electrophysiology Humans Pacemaker, Artificial English Abstract Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J F Godin, H Le Marec. 1988. [Which pacemaker for which patient?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3223721/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Analysis of vagally induced sinus arrhythmias.

Vagal stimulation at precise times in successive cardiac cycles can elicit sinus arrhythmias. Two mechanisms have been identified that can, but do not necessarily, cause these vagally induced sinus arrhythmias. First, changes in cycle length elicited by a given concentration of acetylcholine (ACh) depend on the phase of the pacemaker cell action potential when the ACh binds to muscarinic receptors. Second, acetylcholinesterase degrades ACh rapidly enough for the mean concentration of ACh per cardiac cycle to vary from cycle to cycle. We used a mathematical model of the underlying cellular physiology, to examine whether these mechanisms are responsible for arrhythmogenesis. Computer simulation showed that both mechanisms contribute to the vagally induced sinus arrhythmias.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

PubMed1992

Asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in healthy persons: smoke or smoke screen?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

PubMed1992

Prognosis of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and of survivors of cardiac arrest not inducible by programmed stimulation.

The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term clinical outcome of 60 prospectively studied patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia that was not inducible during baseline programmed ventricular stimulation: 39 with cardiac arrest due to noninfarction ventricular fibrillation (VF) and 21 with mild hemodynamically compromising sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 +/- 14% in the VF group and 50 +/- 13% in the VT group (difference not significant). Patients were discharged without conventional antiarrhythmic drugs and received only empirical beta-blocker therapy. During a mean follow-up period of 21 +/- 16 months (mean +/- SD), 10 of 60 patients (17%) died suddenly. The actuarial incidence of sudden death at 1 and 4 years was similar in both groups (VF group, 10 and 20%; VT group, 16 and 16%) (p = 0.48). The actuarial incidence of sudden cardiac death was significantly higher in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% than in those with > 40% (1-year incidence in VF group, 40 vs 0%; VT group, 50 vs 0%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis identified left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% and previous myocardial infarction as the only independent predictor of sudden cardiac death. The occurrence of frequent ventricular pairs during Holter monitoring was the only independent predictor of sustained VT recurrences. It is concluded that patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in whom arrhythmia was non-inducible during baseline ventricular stimulation and not treated with antiarrhythmic therapy have a favorable outcome if left ventricular ejection fraction is high.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗